I tested a couple vit. C developers that I think were a bit more amateur: Mocon X, which had low activity and LSD-6 which had high activity. I could have diluted the LSD-6 and tested it further. The first one was probably usable at higher times, but it had a pronounced shoulder. Both had higher b+f than ID-11 or HC110 which seems consistent with your results with DS-12. I was going to try DS-12 and believe it would be one of the better ones.
I was plotting curves using Axum scientific graphing package, before I found Winplotter. I could plot one curve consisting of multiple step wedge exposures to see shoulders. Winplotter unfortunately doesn't seem to be able to do that. The ES offset applies to everything and there is no way to make one curve consisting of multiple 21 step exposures, so I can't display the Mocon-X shoulder with Winplotter.
I've used DS-12 in the past, mostly last year. I liked it 1+1 with Pan F+ 35mm and 3 min. agitations. I tried it on fp4+ 35mm and it was ok, but I didn't continue to use it with fp4+. I also tried it with Acros 120 and liked it, mostly 2+1 or 1+1 and 3 min. agitations. Bottom line, I ended up using DS-10 because I got better results. I did play around a little with the formula by sub. .8g of p-aminophenol in place of the .4g of metol per 1L and I did like what I saw with fp4+ in 35mm, but I have not continued to use it. One advantage is that you can mix it 5x and it keeps well once mixed. YMMV
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?