RattyMouse
Allowing Ads
The present "Adox" has no connection (other than the trademark) with the 1860 company....there is an interesting history on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADOX .
The current company is one of the sponsors of APUG. Click on the link on the Home Page here.
Adox films today are made by and for Fotoimpex in Berlin, they've had film coated by Innovision? (an exAgfa coating line), Ilford, and now have their own facility at MArly in Switzerland which is the old Tellko site which became part of Ilford when both were owned by Ciba Geigy. In recent years it was seperate to Ilford in the UK and made Cibachrome/Ilfochrome.......
Ian
The correct company name is InovisCoat. http://www.inoviscoat.de/en/
Today's films, yes.So the Adox films are not just re-branded emulsions but specifically made by or for Adox?
Thanks for the replies everyone. Now it's a bit easier for me to understand why this company exists. I was perplexed at how such an old company can be so relatively irrelevant to the film world. No offense intended but their product line is extremely limited. Not what I would expect for a 150+ year old company!
So the Adox films are not just re-branded emulsions but specifically made by or for Adox?
Thanks for the replies everyone. Now it's a bit easier for me to understand why this company exists. I was perplexed at how such an old company can be so relatively irrelevant to the film world. No offense intended but their product line is extremely limited. Not what I would expect for a 150+ year old company!
Not what I would expect for a 150+ year old company!
There is a link. Adox CHS 100 II is a continuation of the original Adox 21 via Efke 100 and Adox CHS 100.
Mirko indicated Adox CHS II is a new emulsion, however designed to have some similar characteristics. EFKE used festoon coating which had gone out of use many years ago elsewhere, modern coating lines use cascade coating heads based on work done by Ilford, the emulsions needed are quite different.
Ian
I might be wrong, but isn't festoon drying the predecessor of current drying tunnels, not coating methods? I'd suspect that the Fotokemika coater was a slot die extruder or similar for the film coating, not sure whether they used a different coating method for paper.
Well technically it's the drying but it's a crucial part of the coating process ans it can lead to coating problems and imperfections..
(there was a url link here which no longer exists) (#29) shows the Fotokemika coating line, it's very crude compared to modern standards
Ian
Mirko and his ADOX/Fotoimpex team are doing a great job when comes to supply us with alternatives to the larger manufacturers. Also remember that ADOX resurrected the cancelled, and by many missed, black and white paper Agfa MCC 111 . The present denomination is ADOX MCC 110 and I use it as my main paper with great plesure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?