• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

ADOX D-76 Question

dynachrome

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,863
Format
35mm
My Freestyle order arrived today and it included three 1-liter packets of ADOX D-76. On the front of the package there is a time of 7 minutes at 68F for Tri-X. The Kodak D-76 time is 8 minutes. Is there supposed to be this difference? I know that there are many versions of D-76 floating around. I have a gallon of L-76 mixed up now.

One more developer question. I buy distilled water in plastic jugs. If it sits in the jugs for a while, can it affect the activity of developer I mix up using it?
 
On the front of the package there is a time of 7 minutes at 68F for Tri-X. The Kodak D-76 time is 8 minutes.

That's a 14% difference. Not major. I'd start with whichever time appeals to you and take it from there. Don't attribute too much meaning to slight differences in published development times. Between versions of a film, measurement practices and definitions, there can me minor changes over time that account for such small differences.

I buy distilled water in plastic jugs. If it sits in the jugs for a while, can it affect the activity of developer I mix up using it?

Nope. Perfectly fine.
 
I've found that Kodak's listed development times for their films are more suited for a Condenser enlarger. I find them more difficult to scan (grass looks white, highlights almost blow). Kodak mentions this on some of their datasheets, and suggests reducing development times by 10%.

You may find Adox's published times work better, and with condenser enlargers, you can always bump up the contrast anyway.
 
I recently looked at Kodak’s researched film bulletin F4043. This tech bulletin is for Tmax 400 film and it mentions publish times are for a diffused light source. Kodak provides the CI index chart on page eight. The appropriate developing time for a semi condenser light source should be between .52 to .56. Although the chart is for TMY-2 I find if I reduce Tri-X and FP-4 development by 60-90s my negatives print on grade 3. I use an EI of 200 for Tri-X and 100 for FP-4. My enlarger is a LPL 670 semi condenser.
 
Last edited:

No, they are intended for diffusion.
 
Kodak D76 times also do not match the ID-11 datasheet even though it's supposedly the same developer. In your case I would go with the ADOX time. ADOX is a real company with an R&D department and manufacturing. On the other hand, the Kodak datasheet is essentially a tombstone inscription from the distant past.
 
I have ordered some of the Adox D76 developer which should arrive soon. Hopefully, it perfectly matches the Kodak product.

Has anyone noticed any differences between the two products? Kodak D-76 and Ilford ID11 are currently unavailable in the UK.
 
ADOX is a real company with an R&D department and manufacturing. On the other hand, the Kodak datasheet is essentially a tombstone inscription from the distant past.

Yes those words kind of remind me of those of Frankie Laine:

Boot Hill, Boot Hill
So cold, so still



pentaxuser
 
I have ordered some of the Adox D76 developer which should arrive soon. Hopefully, it perfectly matches the Kodak product.

Has anyone noticed any differences between the two products? Kodak D-76 and Ilford ID11 are currently unavailable in the UK.

It is safe to assume that these three developers are interchangeable. D-76 is D-76 regardless of who made it.
 
I have ordered some of the Adox D76 developer which should arrive soon. Hopefully, it perfectly matches the Kodak product.

Has anyone noticed any differences between the two products? Kodak D-76 and Ilford ID11 are currently unavailable in the UK.

Keith, this probably answers your question perfectly.