ADOX D-76 Question

Forum statistics

Threads
198,314
Messages
2,772,762
Members
99,593
Latest member
StephenWu
Recent bookmarks
0

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,751
Format
35mm
My Freestyle order arrived today and it included three 1-liter packets of ADOX D-76. On the front of the package there is a time of 7 minutes at 68F for Tri-X. The Kodak D-76 time is 8 minutes. Is there supposed to be this difference? I know that there are many versions of D-76 floating around. I have a gallon of L-76 mixed up now.

One more developer question. I buy distilled water in plastic jugs. If it sits in the jugs for a while, can it affect the activity of developer I mix up using it?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,054
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
On the front of the package there is a time of 7 minutes at 68F for Tri-X. The Kodak D-76 time is 8 minutes.

That's a 14% difference. Not major. I'd start with whichever time appeals to you and take it from there. Don't attribute too much meaning to slight differences in published development times. Between versions of a film, measurement practices and definitions, there can me minor changes over time that account for such small differences.

I buy distilled water in plastic jugs. If it sits in the jugs for a while, can it affect the activity of developer I mix up using it?

Nope. Perfectly fine.
 

Brad Deputy

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
171
Location
Martha Lake, WA
Format
35mm
I've found that Kodak's listed development times for their films are more suited for a Condenser enlarger. I find them more difficult to scan (grass looks white, highlights almost blow). Kodak mentions this on some of their datasheets, and suggests reducing development times by 10%.

You may find Adox's published times work better, and with condenser enlargers, you can always bump up the contrast anyway.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
I recently looked at Kodak’s researched film bulletin F4043. This tech bulletin is for Tmax 400 film and it mentions publish times are for a diffused light source. Kodak provides the CI index chart on page eight. The appropriate developing time for a semi condenser light source should be between .52 to .56. Although the chart is for TMY-2 I find if I reduce Tri-X and FP-4 development by 60-90s my negatives print on grade 3. I use an EI of 200 for Tri-X and 100 for FP-4. My enlarger is a LPL 670 semi condenser.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 30, 2023
Messages
454
Location
Cleveland
Format
35mm
I've found that Kodak's listed development times for their films are more suited for a Condenser enlarger. I find them more difficult to scan (grass looks white, highlights almost blow). Kodak mentions this on some of their datasheets, and suggests reducing development times by 10%.

You may find Adox's published times work better, and with condenser enlargers, you can always bump up the contrast anyway.

No, they are intended for diffusion.
 

Steven Lee

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Messages
1,411
Location
USA
Format
Medium Format
Kodak D76 times also do not match the ID-11 datasheet even though it's supposedly the same developer. In your case I would go with the ADOX time. ADOX is a real company with an R&D department and manufacturing. On the other hand, the Kodak datasheet is essentially a tombstone inscription from the distant past.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,805
Location
Plymouth. UK
Format
Multi Format
I have ordered some of the Adox D76 developer which should arrive soon. Hopefully, it perfectly matches the Kodak product.

Has anyone noticed any differences between the two products? Kodak D-76 and Ilford ID11 are currently unavailable in the UK.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,788
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
ADOX is a real company with an R&D department and manufacturing. On the other hand, the Kodak datasheet is essentially a tombstone inscription from the distant past.

Yes those words kind of remind me of those of Frankie Laine:

Boot Hill, Boot Hill
So cold, so still

😄

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,055
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
I have ordered some of the Adox D76 developer which should arrive soon. Hopefully, it perfectly matches the Kodak product.

Has anyone noticed any differences between the two products? Kodak D-76 and Ilford ID11 are currently unavailable in the UK.

It is safe to assume that these three developers are interchangeable. D-76 is D-76 regardless of who made it.
 

Mick Fagan

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
4,419
Location
Melbourne Au
Format
Multi Format
I have ordered some of the Adox D76 developer which should arrive soon. Hopefully, it perfectly matches the Kodak product.

Has anyone noticed any differences between the two products? Kodak D-76 and Ilford ID11 are currently unavailable in the UK.

Keith, this probably answers your question perfectly.


 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom