Phritz, I have no objections to any other related questions here. Unfortunately I don't have an answer for you.
I managed to figure out negatives down sandwiching two 6X6 or 6X9 or a combination there of. This is a logical progression of what I've been working on previously.
Someone messaged me this:
Ive read your post several times and its unclear what youre trying to accomplish. I think that most folks reading the post need further detail in order to understand your needs before we might offer useful suggestions.
Do you wish to enlarge these several frames simultaneously onto photographic printing paper? If so then the only practical solution is to place them between two sheets of glass. There are glass sandwich negative carriers for MF and LF enlargers that would make this easy. But it isnt too difficult to cut a couple of pieces of thin glass to do the same thing. I refer, of course, to simply placing the negatives onto the bottom glass au you want them and laying the top sheet on top, and placing the sandwich into an enlarger and making the print. Gluing them together is going to be messy and ugly at best. Too, once glued the assembly is irreversible.
So let me clarify a few things.
I want to compose elements
cut elements of smaller negatives onto an unexposed and processed e.g. blank 4X5 negative. Not just sandwiching one or several negatives. I then want to be able to take these negatives for printing at any competent lab.
I really don't want to use negative carriers for several reasons. First off getting smaller pieces of negatives to stay in place while assembling is difficult. Film curls and things scoot around. Secondly I don't have an enlarger at the moment, and I won't be able to for the foreseeable future. I do not have the space to place one or the money to buy one. If something can't fit into one suitcase it's too large for me to own. Due to generally being itinerant I need an end result that can be printed at any lab.
I'm aware of the pitfalls involved in the process I'm attempting to figure out here: Negatives will be sacrificed. Results won't look that great until I figure out a good process, if that's ever. As well as it generally being a pain in the ass.
Thanks,
Chris