c6h6o3
Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2002
- Messages
- 3,215
- Format
- Large Format
Personally, I don't think Adams' pictures are anything like what the eye sees, however. Their strength is in the fact that they are not, in fact. They are extreme and fantastic (as in "of or pertaining to fantasy") manipulations that get more to the emotional heart of a subject than a purely literal rendition would (i.e. attempting to render exactly what the eye sees).
To me, Adams is to photography what Albert Bierstadt is to painting.