• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Acuspecial FX21 developer as alternative to stand development

The numbers don't make any sense. But what gives; just round them to .1. Except the phenidone. That one can best be mixed as e.g. a 1% concentrate in glycol and then dosed with a pipette unless very large batches are being made.
Round to your taste. These are the numbers from the formula. I give them as I received them.
 

I mix up and round off. It's difficult to get them to this accuracy, and unnecessary.
 
Hmmm... What is still missing in that formula? I'm sure with some metaborate and 1.054g of Glycin it would perform much better. </sarcasm>
 
These weight values are probably converted from another unit of measurement. They can be rounded to a reasonable accuracy. Regarding the carbonate - put in the one you have, just calculate the weight relative to the monohydrate. There is no monohydrate available here, only the anhydrous form. I assume that the original formula used something from the nearest general store. Unfortunately, there is no data on the pH of the working solution.
 

The commonest form of Sodium Carbonate available (at least in the US) is the mono-hydrate. The anhydrous form slowly absorbs water from the atmosphere and eventually becomes mono-hydrate. To convert mono-hydrate to anhydrous, multiply by about 0.855.
 
Last edited:
I have heaps of anhydrous form, but I do have the mono-hydrate on order (from Argentix) but sadly it has been sitting in limbo land, due to Postal strike. With no end in sight to that mess, I'll just go ahead and use the anhydrous form...
 

But how to measure those .5 mg levels of chemicals!
 
I would like Bill Troop to contribute to this thread as I believe it's from the FDC2.

See #5. If you follow the link, you'll notice Bill Troop has in fact commented on the formula, although AFAIK (didn't read all of the 5 pages) not on the quantities, apart from some discussion of the buffering system and its required exactness.
 
But how to measure those .5 mg levels of chemicals!

Either pick up a scale on Amazon that'll do mg (I picked up a cheap digital one there), or round up the numbers.
 
It’s a bit of a Christmas pudding, isn’t it? I mean, it seems to have a bit of everything in it, including 3 developing agents. Would anyone care to suggest how it might all work?
 
Either pick up a scale on Amazon that'll do mg (I picked up a cheap digital one there), or round up the numbers.

I have just prepared a 15x concentrate. It's not very difficult with my 10 mg scale. Only potassium iodide was an issue, I just prepared a 1% solution and took required amount of solution.
 
Any information regarding the longevity of the 15x concentrate?
 
It’s a bit of a Christmas pudding, isn’t it? I mean, it seems to have a bit of everything in it, including 3 developing agents. Would anyone care to suggest how it might all work?

It seems to be a bit over the top as far as ingredients go. I've never mixed up a developer with so much going in...especially after working with D-23 the past few weeks! Currently, I'm working on a video where I'll compare it with semi-stand in Pyrocat-HD.
 
It’s a bit of a Christmas pudding, isn’t it? I mean, it seems to have a bit of everything in it, including 3 developing agents. Would anyone care to suggest how it might all work?
If you think this formula is complicated, have a look at the MSDS for Spurs HRX. If I remember correctly, it's got two or three different types of Phenidone etc
 
Any information regarding the longevity of the 15x concentrate?

I expect the working solution to last no more than 2-3 hours. For the concentrate - it depends a lot on how it is stored, but probably no more than three months. If the concentrate is made in two parts - the first glycol, the developing agents, potassium metabisulfite (replacing the sodium one from the original formula) and the limiters, and in the second - everything else. If the formula is changed to potassium, the concentration can become much larger and with a higher durability.
This formula is a little strange to me - I'm not a chemist, but from what I understand, the metabisulfite will react quickly with the hydroxide to form a sulfite with a very slight excess of hydroxide. These components are a little strange to me.
 
Last edited:

It was sold commercially as Acuspecial by Paterson. Designed by Crawley. I know it works well, as I have used it for several rolls now. Just keep the agitation normal (2 inversions once per minute, with a twist) and it should work for you too.

 

I'll definitely try your suggestion of making Propylene Glycol solution of the developing agents, but, I'll first get myself used to the developer itself.
 
after working with D-23 the past few weeks! Currently, I'm working on a video where I'll compare it with semi-stand in Pyrocat-HD.
That will be an interesting video, Andy. Seeing you mention D23 has reminded me that John Finch did a video comparing FX55 with D23

pentaxuser
 
Disheartening failure with my first try with FX-21! The negative came out blank! Don't know whether the developer got contaminated somehow? Used 1:14 for Tmax 100, 8 minutes @23°C.
 
How much iodide did you put in the concentrate? And how much hydroxide? If you are unsure about the iodide measurement, it is better to skip it...