A mint Canon Eos 55, 28-90 kit lens, 17mm Vivitar series 1 and a faded Lambretta shoulder bag all for under £100 , and a set up that gave me a lot of fun and decent, for me, photos. The best build in this price range surely is the F90x, with a lens ,for under £100. The F80 is excellent and the F100 is superb, but Mr. Glass, many careful owners have experienced the rear door problem with an age-expired plastic catch. In the main it is not their fault. Mr. Huss, we are lucky to own the F6, I had to sell my F5 to finance the deal and my old camera was the real pro machine but the F6 will be with me to the end.
I know that many people have this problem that probably occurred from slamming the film door shut, one does not have to slam it hard. Huss just has a crusade about that for some reason.
People in general proudly treat their cameras terribly. Look on YouTube for a million examples.I know that many people have this problem that probably occurred from slamming the film door shut, one does not have to slam it hard. Huss just has a crusade about that for some reason.
And as usual a thread goes down the route of recommending cameras people own but which override the OPO's idea, rather than more applicable cameras people could recommend. It's like the usual 'buy my recommended camera/lens because it justifies my life!' irrespective of the context.
I missed that, must have misread his first post, where does he say that he Nikon AF? In his second post he mentioned that he had spent time with Nikon AF, did not say he owns any Nikon Mount lens.
Even then he did mention a N80, a F100 is only one step up, both are great cameras, at this point we are splitting hairs then asking what is the color of the wind.
He has a Nikon DLSR.
We talked about this many times before. I do not use any camera as a hammer, so I have never in over 60 years had such a problem. You may want to trade in your extra thumbs for fingers.
View attachment 300213
Thanks for this, I had no idea Minolta had incompatibility issues. That helps me decide between a 5 or one of the older or lower end models.The only Minolta film bodies that can use Sony/Zeiss SSM lens or late Minolta G SSM lens are the 7 and 5, or if you get lucky and find a factory upgraded 9. The reason the A lens are relative inexpensive is that Sony has killed the A mount line up, bodies and lens. The earlier gear driven Minolta primes that you want to think about. 24mm F2, 28mm 2.8, 50mm 1.4, 100 2.8, 135 2.8 and for a street zoom, the 24 to 85 4.5 APO.
Pete, if you;re only going to shoot now and then, why do you need so many fixed lenses like 50, 85, and 100 when you have a 35-105 zoom? Are you shooting indoors without strobes light?Hi all, new user here. It's been about 12 years since I last shot film. I sold my gear (Minolta Maxxum 7 and some great lenses) and have been happy with digital. Lately I've caught the film bug and have had the urge to shoot some B&W, which is the only part of film I missed. I recently scored a mint Minolta XD11 & 50mm f1.2 combo for a really good price on eBay (gotta love when sellers don't list out the specifics of their lot). While I like it and will enjoy adapting the 50mm to my Sony, I'd prefer an autofocus system.
The main gear I'd want is an intermediate level body, a fast 50 and something fast around 85-135. Then maybe 24/28/35 and a midrange zoom if there are any cheap hidden gems out there. Main subject matter would be portraits, and urban/street scenes. No landscape. So while I want good glass, I'm not excessively worried about maximizing edge-to-edge sharpness. I'd also be interested in "character" or "sleeper" lenses.
So assuming you wanted to build a simple, cheapish AF 35mm system that still gave high-quality results, what would you go with?
As a Minolta fan, my first inclination was something in the Maxxum family. With some careful shopping I can get a Maxxum 5, 50 1.7, 28 2.8, and 35-105 for less than $100. The 50mm 1.4 might add an additional $100. The fast 85 and 100 are a little pricey though. Though the selection is not great, Sony A-mount lenses seem to be among the best value in AF SLR lenses today. And if I decide to grow the collection, the Sony/Zeiss primes are all priced great compared to their MSRP (or the Sony e-mount equivalents).
On the other hand, bodies like the Canon Elan 7 or Nikon N80 offer a better foundation and would open up a greater selection of lenses and access to more good third-party lenses.
I am not concerned in any capacity with "cool factor" or the looks of a system. Just usability, the resultant images, and affordability. So, have at it! What brand would you choose if you were me?
You may want to pass on that info to all the other owners of broken F100s.
The N80 requires the use of AF lenses for the meter to work, does not have Ai coupling. This is not an issue for the AF lenses that the OP has.
The N80 takes CR123a Lithium Batteries.
The N70 has an Ai coupling, goes for ~$25. Also uses the Lithium batteries.
The N8008s and N90s have Ai coupling and take AA batteries.
When I reread both post he said he had experience with Nikon, but stated that he was using Minolta MD with a mirrorless body.
"Minolta XD11 & 50mm f1.2 combo for a really good price on eBay (gotta love when sellers don't list out the specifics of their lot). While I like it and will enjoy adapting the 50mm to my Sony, I'd prefer an autofocus"
"Hmm. That's actually what I had first considered, since I spent some time with Nikon DSLRs."
Thanks for this, I had no idea Minolta had incompatibility issues. That helps me decide between a 5 or one of the older or lower end models.
The N80 requires the use of AF lenses for the meter to work, does not have Ai coupling. This is not an issue for the AF lenses that the OP has.
The N80 takes CR123a Lithium Batteries.
The N70 has an Ai coupling, goes for ~$25. Also uses the Lithium batteries.
The N8008s and N90s have Ai coupling and take AA batteries.
Pete, if you;re only going to shoot now and then, why do you need so many fixed lenses like 50, 85, and 100 when you have a 35-105 zoom
Hi all, new user here. It's been about 12 years since I last shot film. I sold my gear (Minolta Maxxum 7 and some great lenses) and have been happy with digital. Lately I've caught the film bug and have had the urge to shoot some B&W, which is the only part of film I missed. I recently scored a mint Minolta XD11 & 50mm f1.2 combo for a really good price on eBay (gotta love when sellers don't list out the specifics of their lot). While I like it and will enjoy adapting the 50mm to my Sony, I'd prefer an autofocus system.
The main gear I'd want is an intermediate level body, a fast 50 and something fast around 85-135. Then maybe 24/28/35 and a midrange zoom if there are any cheap hidden gems out there. Main subject matter would be portraits, and urban/street scenes. No landscape. So while I want good glass, I'm not excessively worried about maximizing edge-to-edge sharpness. I'd also be interested in "character" or "sleeper" lenses.
So assuming you wanted to build a simple, cheapish AF 35mm system that still gave high-quality results, what would you go with?
As a Minolta fan, my first inclination was something in the Maxxum family. With some careful shopping I can get a Maxxum 5, 50 1.7, 28 2.8, and 35-105 for less than $100. The 50mm 1.4 might add an additional $100. The fast 85 and 100 are a little pricey though. Though the selection is not great, Sony A-mount lenses seem to be among the best value in AF SLR lenses today. And if I decide to grow the collection, the Sony/Zeiss primes are all priced great compared to their MSRP (or the Sony e-mount equivalents).
On the other hand, bodies like the Canon Elan 7 or Nikon N80 offer a better foundation and would open up a greater selection of lenses and access to more good third-party lenses.
I am not concerned in any capacity with "cool factor" or the looks of a system. Just usability, the resultant images, and affordability. So, have at it! What brand would you choose if you were me?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?