About to do some filter experiments with B&W portraits

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 15
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 3
  • 0
  • 42
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 43
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 34
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,900
Messages
2,782,732
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

hoffy

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
3,073
Location
Adelaide, Au
Format
Multi Format
Hi Folks,

I want to do some experiments with different colour filters on portraits. While I understand the basics from playing digitally (reds smooth blemishes, blues exaggerate them), I am not 100% sure whether that will translate across to film and each films own idiosyncrasies.

While I have used Red and Green in the field before on film, I am not sure what will happen if I start using blue. I have read (but not seen) that blue may kill contrast.

I want to be able to bring out freckles and blemishes. I am also keen to see what filters does to tattoos and similar body art.

Typically, films could be Ilford FP4+/HP5+/Delta 100, Acros and/or Foma 200.

Does anyone have any tips or pointers on where to start, without spending a wad on filters that may be useless?

Cheers
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,655
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Hi Folks,

I want to do some experiments with different colour filters on portraits. While I understand the basics from playing digitally (reds smooth blemishes, blues exaggerate them), I am not 100% sure whether that will translate across to film and each films own idiosyncrasies.

While I have used Red and Green in the field before on film, I am not sure what will happen if I start using blue. I have read (but not seen) that blue may kill contrast.

I want to be able to bring out freckles and blemishes. I am also keen to see what filters does to tattoos and similar body art.

Typically, films could be Ilford FP4+/HP5+/Delta 100, Acros and/or Foma 200.

Does anyone have any tips or pointers on where to start, without spending a wad on filters that may be useless?

Cheers
Hoffy, freckles would respond to green the best but in general iI limit myself to yellow because,it gives the most realistic view with the exception of emphasising blue venes.
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,407
Format
Medium Format
This will be a very rewarding experiment I think. Curious to see the results! To accentuate freckles, I would suggest light blue or also green.
 
OP
OP
hoffy

hoffy

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2009
Messages
3,073
Location
Adelaide, Au
Format
Multi Format
Thought I would pop in - I finally scanned the experiments I tried and here are the results (Yes, this is word for word the same post on another forum):


Dave
by Ashley Hoff, on Flickr


Dannielle
by Ashley Hoff, on Flickr


Andrew
by Ashley Hoff, on Flickr

All shot with the same setup:
Rig: Toyo 45A, Caltar II E 210 F6.8 lens on Foma 200
Lighting: 2 Softboxes in a clamshell configuration

The effect wasn't as strong as I was expecting, but I think the lighting configuration flattened out the skin a bit.
Dave was shot with a green filter.
Dannielle was shot with a red filter.
Andrew was shot with no filter.

I think the next time I have a chance in the studio I will try a different light setup to see what I can achieve.

Cheers
 

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
I assisted a photographer for many years, and he did a shoot with a friend who was a bodybuilder:

nude_08_tn.jpg


This guy is *not* Afro-American, he is Caucasian. The photographer simply used an 80B filter on Tri-X and shot with some mood (for this shot), others were shot similarly but on a white background.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,974
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I assisted a photographer for many years, and he did a shoot with a friend who was a bodybuilder:

View attachment 187090

This guy is *not* Afro-American, he is Caucasian. The photographer simply used an 80B filter on Tri-X and shot with some mood (for this shot), others were shot similarly but on a white background.
This is quite incredible. Can you say how much "mood" contributed here in terms of the lighting to get this very tanned look? On the other site given as links there seems comments to the effect that green would act in the same way but I have never seen green produce this effect unless the model was considerably tanned in the first place. Was the print overexposed to aid the tanned rendition.

I am not trying to be "picky" but would simply like to ascertain how much the 80B's contribution was.

Thanks

pentaxuser
 

macfred

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
3,839
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
... On the other site given as links there seems comments to the effect that green would act in the same way but I have never seen green produce this effect...

My daughter Mia has some freckles and I tried to enhance them .
I used a B&W Schneider Kreuznach green filter (3x / +1.5 stops) with only a light effect. I just ordered a KB15 (equal to 80B) and I will try it again.

Mia by Andreas, on Flickr
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,974
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Thanks macfred. I await ozphoto's response with interest. I mention the over-exposure explanation as I recall taking pictures of my son's bride,now wife, with Neopan 400 at the wedding, probably without any filter as the shot was indoors> When doing the print I made a test print where I over-exposed considerably several sections and I was surprised how tanned she looked without it affecting her bride's outfit. If you had not known the real colour of her skin you would certainly have taken her for a very tanned person and the rest of the picture would have still looked relatively OK

pentaxuser
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Instead of reinventing the wheel why not invest in a book on portraiture. It will contain more that just filtration but also other aspects of this branch of photography. The book will probably cost less than the film expended in the 'experiments.'
 

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
This is quite incredible. Can you say how much "mood" contributed here in terms of the lighting to get this very tanned look? On the other site given as links there seems comments to the effect that green would act in the same way but I have never seen green produce this effect unless the model was considerably tanned in the first place. Was the print overexposed to aid the tanned rendition.

I am not trying to be "picky" but would simply like to ascertain how much the 80B's contribution was.

Thanks

pentaxuser

I'll have to check with him for you to answer these questions - I didn't work on this particular shoot, he shot it a couple of years prior to me commencing work with him.

I met him when I was at college, and remember him explaining the effect to me (pretty much what I stated above); when the shot was shown to the class, I let others comment on it, without them being told how it was shot, only commenting when pressed by the lecturer.

Could be a couple of weeks - he's currently shooting in China.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Because its more fun to experience for yourself what can be achieved.

Still I would recommend a book. It might be fun to read! To repeat there is more to portraiture than just filters. Lots more if you are interested in doing a good job of it.
 

ozphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
1,918
Location
Adelaide, SA, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Ok. I was able to chat to the photographer last night, as he was chilling out after the day's shoot. He can't recall every tiny detail (they were shot over 20 years ago), but he was able to recall the following:
  • Images shot on the black background were shot on Tri-X
  • Images shot on the white background were shot on 400 TMax
  • Underexposed by about 2/3 of a stop
  • He only used gridded lights on the model
  • Shot them on his Blad
  • Full-frame
  • The printer undertook a lot of dodging and burning in - these are analog prints, made before the dawn of the digital age
  • All images were printed on Ilford paper (but he can't recall the actual name of the paper)
  • He thinks the owner of Atkins Technicolor still has one of the series hanging in his office
In his own words: "I was after the contrast!"

I did meet the model around 2006/7 at the photographer's place; I guess we usually describe his skin-tone as "olive" (?), ie: not whiter-than-white, like Northern Europeans, but he's not overly tanned either.

HTH, Hoffy et al. :smile:
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom