A simple diopter question...

Pump House?

A
Pump House?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
Deer Lake Infrared

D
Deer Lake Infrared

  • 3
  • 0
  • 32
Tree in warm light

D
Tree in warm light

  • 0
  • 0
  • 27
Sonatas XII-33 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-33 (Homes)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 38
24mm

H
24mm

  • 1
  • 0
  • 53

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,421
Messages
2,791,388
Members
99,907
Latest member
Dlu22
Recent bookmarks
0

voceumana

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
896
Location
USA (Utah)
Format
Multi Format
It's really a shame that manufacturers did not develop a standard used by all, and use standard nomenclature for there diopters. Bronica, for example, lists their standard eyepiece as a negative diopter value but the lens is certainly a positive lens. Go figure.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
It's really a shame that manufacturers did not develop a standard used by all, and use standard nomenclature for there diopters.
There is a standard nomenclature, which is the optics unit "diopter".
One finds it on eyepiece correcting attachments as on close-up lenses.

Many here mix that up with "eyepiece", as in the USA a eyepiece also is called diopter.
 

voceumana

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
896
Location
USA (Utah)
Format
Multi Format
Bronica says its standard eyepiece has a negative diopter value even though it is a positive lens. It does not help to clarify the situation.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,467
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
There is a standard nomenclature, which is the optics unit "diopter".
One finds it on eyepiece correcting attachments as on close-up lenses.

Many here mix that up with "eyepiece", as in the USA a eyepiece also is called diopter.
Yah, 'diopter' is in common. But is the strength (indicated on the diopter eyepiece)
  1. Relative to what is the standard eyepiece strength so it is incrementally stronger/weaker than 'standard eyepiece' strength by whatever value, or
  2. is it the Absolute diopter strength of the lens in the eyepiece?!
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,467
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
That's more what I'm hoping to find... so after your paragraph saying "+1.5 offset my eye needs a true diopter -2.5" and so on... and then standard eyepiece and I need a +1.5 or +2.5... not sure if I'm reading this properly, but in the simplest terms - if I need a +1.5 reader for reading and 1-meter-ish work, then I need something around a +1.5 diopter, depending on how the manufacturer dealt with it??

Right...the key question is "How did the manufacturer deal with the labelling of the Accessory's strength?"...Do you
  1. buy an accessory called '+1.5' which is stronger relative to the standard eyepice by that amount, or
  2. do you buy an accessory called '+2.5' which has an absolute strength optically which can be measured by optician?
Going back to Bronica which was brought up, Bronica state they offer range of -4.5 to +1.5...but standard eyepiece is -1.5
  • so, from Bronica, you buy -2.5 or -3.5 or -4.5 if you need Negative correction from standard or
    you buy -0.5 or +0.5 or +1.5 if yoiu need Positive correction from standard Absolute strength of the diopter lens.
  • But for another brand you buy -3 or -2 or -1 for negative offset from standard, or
    buy +1 or +3 or +3 for positive offset from standard
for the exact same six corrections!
Canon, for example, says their dioptric corrections are 'not true'. for the Canon F-1 accessories..you buy Relative offset strengths for the Canon F-1
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom