A really expensive 8x10 camera

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
this camera back has been in development and being tweaked for a long while, im really happy it is finally available !
 

cramej

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
1,235
Format
Multi Format
this camera back has been in development and being tweaked for a long while, im really happy it is finally available !
It was available 3 years ago....now no longer available because they're working on v2.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
Building a sensor this size is an amazing accomplishment. There are applications where such a camera makes economic sense, but a $100,000 buys a lot of film. With cost of the Hasselblad digital back, I don’t believe I’ll be able to buy enough film in my remaining years to substitute digital.
Moreover, I already spend too much time at computer. Enough is enough.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Though I find I the camera fascinating, I agree with you. $100K will buy a lot of film. Maybe a hybrid workflow to save some money by shooting 8x10 film and scan it a real nice scanner. I shoot 8x10 and there's nothing like viewing a negative on a light table. It's a piece of film that was exposed at a place and time. It's physical and could be touched. No software updates required.
 
  • AgX
  • Deleted

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Putting that lens on that camera is like putting lipstick on a pig. No matter what you do, it's still a pig. Correct me if I'm wrong, but having a big sensor, well, it's still a digital camera, right? With all the shortcomings that come w/ that, like less exposure latitude than film, a lower tonal scale, and the inability to make good B&W pics. Other than that, it's a really swell camera :}

Petapixel is the gift that keeps on giving.
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,826
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
Can someone please explain why 12 big mega pixels are better than 20 small mega pixels covering the same scene?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…