A real camera.

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
A new coworker mildly noted the Program Plus around my neck.

"I don't have one of those" she said.

"what, a camera?"

"well, I have a digital camera, but not one like that.

You know, a real camera"

What makes a film camera more real, even to a non-photographer?
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Tradition.
 

arigram

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,465
Location
Crete, Greec
Format
Medium Format
Physicality of the image produced.
 

John Koehrer

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Ever try to pick one of them there electrons the digital camera uses?
They're so tiny! You can hold film in your hand, it's just more comforting.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
Some of us would say a camera with programmed exposure control is not a "real" camera (vbg)
 

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Anscojohn said:
Some of us would say a camera with programmed exposure control is not a "real" camera (vbg)
Click to expand...

Hicks once made the point that one photographer will look at a modern camera with all it's buttons, menus, and modes, and say "way too complicated" and another that owned such a camera would look at a manual camera and hand held meters and attendant mental gyrations, and with the same conviction say "way too complicated".
 

arigram

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,465
Location
Crete, Greec
Format
Medium Format
Nicholas Lindan said:
I was taking pictures in the park one winter and a couple passed and asked "Black and white?"

"Yes," I responded.

"Ah, real pictures." He said, and they walked on.
Click to expand...

In that respect, the word "real" is equal to "valuable", as in "proper, artistic photographs" instead of "worthless personal snapshots". As such, the differentiation becomes the intent and aesthetics of the photograph and not the capturing media.
 

Trevor Crone

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
546
Location
SE.London
Format
Multi Format
A similar thing happened to me only last week. While I had my 4x5 camera set up on a tripod an elderly man came by on his bicycle. On seeing me he turned his bike around while calling out, "am I looking at a REAL photographer?" I replied, "no one has ever called me a REAL photographer before." He stopped, we spoke for a while then he asked what I was taking a picture of. When I explained what was of interest in the scene before us, he bid a courteous farewell, got back on his bike and cycled off, probably saying to himself, "he's not even a photographer, let alone a real photographer."
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,277
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
arigram said:
In that respect, the word "real" is equal to "valuable", as in "proper, artistic photographs" instead of "worthless personal snapshots". As such, the differentiation becomes the intent and aesthetics of the photograph and not the capturing media.
Click to expand...

Not many people take black and white snapshots.

However, black and white personal snapshots are part of the new aesthetic and have become worth quite a bit as 'vernacular photographs'. It seems that, along with whores and politicians, snapshots become respectable if they get old enough.

The link between black and white and "proper and artistic" may not be strictly causal but it has become correlative.

The medium is the message.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
Hicks once made the point that one photographer will look at a modern camera with all it's buttons, menus, and modes, and say "way too complicated" and another that owned such a camera would look at a manual camera and hand held meters and attendant mental gyrations, and with the same conviction say "way too complicated".

I had that very thing said to me recently while I was changing lenses on my Nikon FE. I was a bit at a loss for words trying to understand how she thought fiddling with the menu on her digicam was easier than press a button, twist off old lens, twist on new lens.

Similarly, when I worked at a museum in Toronto I used to spin fleece on a spinning wheel. Both children and adults would ask me if the spinning wheel was real, and I could never figure out if they meant it was an antique, or that is was not automated, or what. Never did I get credit for the wool that was spun -- as we all know, it's the camera...uh, I mean wheel, that does the work, not the operator.
 

dpurdy

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
2,680
Location
Portland OR
Format
8x10 Format
Real as opposed to simulated. Digital stuff goes to great lengths to look like film. Doesn't it? Why is photoshop offering burning in and dodging? maybe I am wrong. Now digital prints can be made on fiber based silver gel paper. Just as good as a real print.
 

Trevor Crone

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
546
Location
SE.London
Format
Multi Format

Indeed; why does digital photography feel that it needs to reinvent the wheel?

What really drives me to distraction is when manufacturers market their FB ink jet papers as looking like, Record Rapid! We've had RR its now gone. Has digital photography not got an original concept? Why does it feel the need to copy darkroom based photography?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…