rogueish Member Joined Apr 30, 2004 Messages 876 Location 3rd Rock Format Multi Format Aug 25, 2004 #26 Quote: Originally Posted by Ian Grant (we can't count Fuji as all their B&W is Ilford anyway) skahde said: BTW: Where is that piece quoted from? best Stefan Click to expand... I have also heard this on several occasions. Don't know if it's true, but won't be surprised. This goes on a lot in industry.
Quote: Originally Posted by Ian Grant (we can't count Fuji as all their B&W is Ilford anyway) skahde said: BTW: Where is that piece quoted from? best Stefan Click to expand... I have also heard this on several occasions. Don't know if it's true, but won't be surprised. This goes on a lot in industry.
sparx Member Joined Feb 17, 2004 Messages 376 Location Norfolk UK Format Medium Format Aug 25, 2004 #27 I shot some Fuji Neopan 1600 recently and the developing times for ilford chemistry were identical to Delta 1600. The finished results were also similar. It was cheaper than Delta as well. Could this be one of Ilfords problems?
I shot some Fuji Neopan 1600 recently and the developing times for ilford chemistry were identical to Delta 1600. The finished results were also similar. It was cheaper than Delta as well. Could this be one of Ilfords problems?
OP OP Ian Grant Subscriber Joined Aug 2, 2004 Messages 23,263 Location West Midland Format Multi Format Aug 25, 2004 #28 [/QUOTE] Quote: Originally Posted by Ian Grant (we can't count Fuji as all their B&W is Ilford anyway) BTW: Where is that piece quoted from? best Stefan[/QUOTE] It's common knowledge that Fuji's Black and white films are manufactured by Ilford, think I also saw it stated in a review in the BJP.
[/QUOTE] Quote: Originally Posted by Ian Grant (we can't count Fuji as all their B&W is Ilford anyway) BTW: Where is that piece quoted from? best Stefan[/QUOTE] It's common knowledge that Fuji's Black and white films are manufactured by Ilford, think I also saw it stated in a review in the BJP.