A note about the Vade Mecum

John Bartley

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
1,386
Location
13 Critchley
Format
8x10 Format
I'm not sure if this is the correct forum, but if it's not maybe a moderator can move it please?

In the PDF version of the Lens Collectors Vade Mecum on page 72 is a discussion about the F2.9 / 8" lenses used on the Williamson F24 aerial cameras from WWII ( WW2 ). They state that while many companies made these lenses for Williamson, Dallmeyer were the only company to print their name on the lens barrels and that the Air Ministry number was 14A/7080.

I have one of these lenses and the stamp is in the form of a "J H D" in white outlined ink letters, but .... the Air Ministry number is 14A/780 , not 7080 which is why I think that the Vade Mecum has a misprint.

Just an FYI for anyone doing future research on the internet (seeing as APUG is going to be the repository for analog photography information).

cheers eh?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
Misprints, mistakes and misinformation in the Vade Mecum is nothing new.

I have a growing list of them, although it's generally better on British lenses than on anything else. But it's still the best resource around...
 
OP
OP

John Bartley

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
1,386
Location
13 Critchley
Format
8x10 Format
It's a fabulous resource, and the reason I posted was to have an internet record. Hopefully these threads are searched occasionally and someone researching this lens will find it.

Maybe we should have a Vade Mecum corrections thread somewhere ... sort of like a wikki?
 

Sanjay Sen

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
1,246
Location
New York, NY
Format
Multi Format
Maybe Sean (or one of the moderators) can make this a sticky thread and all you lens gurus can post corrections/updates for the rest of us.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
I could, but let's see if we get more "errata" first.

I've mislaid my own copy of the VM, so I won't be correcting anything until I can find out what's wrong...
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…