I just meant that you understood the relationship correctly.
A common bit of “wisdom” in LF and ULF lore is the whole thing about bigger cameras slowing you down and this slowing down leading to better photographs because you are forced to be more careful, considerate, thoughtful, whatever. As appealing and logical as that might seem, in my experience I have most often observed it to be untrue, and often the opposite, for a few reasons.
Since this thread is specifically about LF cameras, if we exclude roll film backs (ie limit the discussion to sheet film), 4x5 is realistically the biggest most people should probably consider, especially if photography isn’t a continuous activity. 8x10, for most people, ends up being too much about the “doing”, whether or not they realize it.
Of course DREW will say this is BS, but that’s because he is one of the rare exceptions, having set new standards in all formats.