Dan Fromm Member Joined Mar 23, 2005 Messages 6,835 Format Multi Format Jun 29, 2012 #26 Leigh B said: Hi Dan, Not meaning to quibble, but... If you use 1:1 as the close-focus limit, your maximum lens FL is about 1/2 the bellows draw, which would be 18" in this case. The other 2xFL (@ 1:1) is in front of the lens and is not involved in the bellows draw calculations. - Leigh Click to expand... Leigh, he wants to go to 3:1
Leigh B said: Hi Dan, Not meaning to quibble, but... If you use 1:1 as the close-focus limit, your maximum lens FL is about 1/2 the bellows draw, which would be 18" in this case. The other 2xFL (@ 1:1) is in front of the lens and is not involved in the bellows draw calculations. - Leigh Click to expand... Leigh, he wants to go to 3:1
Leigh B Member Joined Jan 17, 2011 Messages 2,059 Location Maryland, USA Format Multi Format Jun 29, 2012 #27 OK. I find no mention of 3:1 earlier in the thread. - Leigh
Dan Fromm Member Joined Mar 23, 2005 Messages 6,835 Format Multi Format Jun 29, 2012 #28 Leigh B said: OK. I find no mention of 3:1 earlier in the thread. - Leigh Click to expand... See post #18 in this thread. Dan "none so blind as he who does not want to see" Fromm
Leigh B said: OK. I find no mention of 3:1 earlier in the thread. - Leigh Click to expand... See post #18 in this thread. Dan "none so blind as he who does not want to see" Fromm
Leigh B Member Joined Jan 17, 2011 Messages 2,059 Location Maryland, USA Format Multi Format Jun 29, 2012 #29 Dan Fromm said: See post #18 in this thread. Click to expand... This is getting quite confused. Post #18 is by Bob Carnie, not the OP, and he does not mention a 36" bellows. Jim Galli mentions a 36" bellows in his response to Bob's post, again not the OP. My post was directed at the OP's original question. (Apologies for trying to stay on-topic.) - Leigh
Dan Fromm said: See post #18 in this thread. Click to expand... This is getting quite confused. Post #18 is by Bob Carnie, not the OP, and he does not mention a 36" bellows. Jim Galli mentions a 36" bellows in his response to Bob's post, again not the OP. My post was directed at the OP's original question. (Apologies for trying to stay on-topic.) - Leigh
Dan Fromm Member Joined Mar 23, 2005 Messages 6,835 Format Multi Format Jun 30, 2012 #30 Leigh B said: This is getting quite confused. Post #18 is by Bob Carnie, not the OP, and he does not mention a 36" bellows. Jim Galli mentions a 36" bellows in his response to Bob's post, again not the OP. My post was directed at the OP's original question. (Apologies for trying to stay on-topic.) - Leigh Click to expand... See posts 18, 19, 21, 23. The OP is long gone, Bob Carnie and I have been discussing Bob's situation. Threads drift. Live with it.
Leigh B said: This is getting quite confused. Post #18 is by Bob Carnie, not the OP, and he does not mention a 36" bellows. Jim Galli mentions a 36" bellows in his response to Bob's post, again not the OP. My post was directed at the OP's original question. (Apologies for trying to stay on-topic.) - Leigh Click to expand... See posts 18, 19, 21, 23. The OP is long gone, Bob Carnie and I have been discussing Bob's situation. Threads drift. Live with it.