process step | function | 3 bath step performing this action |
first developer | develop exposed silver so it doesn't form dye in CD step | first developer |
reexposure | chemically expose left over silver halide such that it can be developed in color developer step | typically included in color developer |
color developer | form dye where first developer left silver halide undeveloped | color developer |
prebleach | scavenge carry over color developer, introduce bleach accelerator, deactivate unreacted color couplers | omitted, deactivation of unreacted color couplers done by STAB |
bleach | convert silver into silver halide | BLIX |
fixer | dissolve silver halide | BLIX |
STAB | protect emulsion from germs and fungus | STAB (also deactivates unreacted color coupler) |
PhotoEngineer claims with a passion that BLIX kits won't archivally desilver color film
I'm not sure, but the only place that looked possible when I was searching was ag-photographic.co. I'm not sure if they will ship to Canada, but it looked like maybe.I too would be interested in a six or seven bath e-6 kit. How do you obtain the Fuji hunt kit in Canada?
I could be wrong, but I think 7 vs 6 bath is just a difference in nomenclature, not in process. The Fuji Hunt E6 kit has 7 processing solutions, but only 6 if you don't count the final rinse.I am interesting the seven bath for E6. Is that only different bleach vs 6 bath?
FD is basically the same for both 7-bath and 3-bath. The CD of 3-bath kits also contains the reexposure compound, so it's a bit different. You should be able to use 3-bath kit CD in a 7-bath process, but you can substitute 3-bath CD only with both reexposure bath and CD from 7-bath kit. The rest of the bathes are not really interchangeable, either you go prebleach, bleach, fix and 7-bath STAB, or you go BLIX and 3-bath STAB. You can use 3-bath STAB for 7-bath process, but not the other way around.Thanks Rudeofus. In the 7-bath steps processing, is there any chemical contents mix change? is it possible get it? Very appreciate !
Fuji does not publish formulas of their kits. The did publish an E6 formula in one of their patents, and PhotoEngineer more or less confirmed that these formulas are correct.
Agree with your comment. Stefan Lange has devised E6 formulas for FD and CD which can be mixed from easy to get photo chemistry (read: chems listed by Suvatlar, Artcraft and Formulary)I advise anyone trying to mix those from scratch to be very, very patient and determined to find all those raw chemicals. In fact, I believe one can’t find all of them.
I'd really like to hear from users who have tried these formulas, Comparisons with results from the official chemistry as well as third-party kits, would be great.Agree with your comment. Stefan Lange has devised E6 formulas for FD and CD which can be mixed from easy to get photo chemistry (read: chems listed by Suvatlar, Artcraft and Formulary)
I have. Actually, these are the only E6 chemicals I've ever used, so I can't compare them to any kits or official chemicals. Anyway, I first mixed the formulae from post #1, the ones under "RECEIPT I , base reciept". The film I developed included gray card shots at -2, -1, 0, +1 and +2 stops. The result was quite bluish, but not terrible. I tried adjusting the potassium iodide content and even doubled it. It didn't seem to make any difference, which got me puzzled. Then I thought about trying the formulae of post #14, which should be revised/improved. I didn't have any ethylenediamine, so I actually mixed just the FD from post #14, but mixed another batch of the CD from post #1. By the way, I also substituted Potassium Carbonate with the equimolar amount of Sodium Carbonate. Anyway, the pH of the FD was correct from the beginning, but the CD was way off. I wasn't entirely sure what the problem was, my cheap pH meter could be problematic, so I used it as is. The result was that the grayscale was better with this combination, but this time it had a green cast. This suggests that the pH of the CD was too low, something that my pH meter hinted at. This probably isn't related to the formula itself, but rather the impure nature of some of my chemicals (CD specific, could be CD3, or citrazinic acid?). I made a correction with some NaOH solution and made another attempt. This time, I had an almost perfect grayscale and the slides looked fine.I'd really like to hear from users who have tried these formulas, Comparisons with results from the official chemistry as well as third-party kits, would be great.
Thanks lot and best to me is know the current situations!Fuji does not publish formulas of their kits. The did publish an E6 formula in one of their patents, and PhotoEngineer more or less confirmed that these formulas are correct.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?