6x9 for Head and Shoulders portraiture?

Hamster

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
202
Format
Med. Format Pan
I am not sure if the thing I am looking for exist.

A camera that allows me to do head and shoulders portraits as 6x9cm contact prints.

The kind of aesthetics I look for should be the same as what I get with a 75mm lens on a 35mm camera.

Ideally uses 120 roll films and reasonably fast to setup and use.

I tried 6x9 folders, but the close focus can just about do 3/4 length portraits and can't get any closer.

I did a bit of research and these came up:
Fuji G690 with 100 or 150mm lens
Kodak Medalist converted to 120 roll film

Any ideas? Do I really need to go LF to get the results I want?
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
If you get some close-up lenses for a 6x9 folder, then you could closer work for portraits.

I think the closest you can usually get with many folders is about five feet or so, so I know what you mean about not being able to get too close.

However, with a negative that big, you could always crop. Unless you'd rather not, which is understandable.

A portrait with a 6x9 folder. As I recall, I didn't want to get any closer, but not because he was threatening. This is my brother-in-law -- incredibly kind man.

 

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
I just put up in the classifieds the perfect camera for this.
The Mamiya Super 23 with 150mm lens with 6x9 back.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
For head and shoulders with that format you are going to need a longer than normal lens, or it seems to me you would be getting facial image distortion. I may be wrong.
 

Rolleiflexible

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
Forget the Medalist and the folders.
They will not get you that close.

My suggestion would be a Graflex
Super D with a 6x9 roll film back.
I've used this for close portraits and
it worked well, and it gives you some
flexibility in lens choices. I'm attaching
a photo I shot with a 3x4 Super D and
its stock 152mm Ektar lens. I believe
you can get closer even than this --
I do not recall racking the lens all the
way out but I shot this ages ago so my
memory might be off.
 

Attachments

  • JR204.jpg
    107.5 KB · Views: 274

DanielStone

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
3,114
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
crown graphic with a 6x9 rollfilm back. put a press-style shutter on there, so you don't have to re-cock in between shots.

or a BABY crown graphic.

-Dan
 

gandolfi

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
1,820
Location
Denmark
Format
Large Format Pan
Voigtlaender Bergheil 6x9 with roll film back. (you can change lenses on this beauty)
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
4x5 view camera with a 6x9 roll film back or the Crown/Speed Graphic with the roll film back. The Graflex SLR, like the Super D is a good choice if you don't need to use flash however, the lens already are on the long side, which is great with 4x5 film, maybe not with the 6x9 image.
 

ghart

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2002
Messages
32
Location
Chester, UK
Format
Large Format
Here's what works for me for head and shoulder portraits:

Ebony 45S, 240 Fuji A lens, Horseman 6x9 RFH.

George
 

tessar

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
355
Location
Calgary, AB,
Format
Multi Format
I like using an old 3x4 Graflex SLR (cheapest format to find) fitted with a 6x9 rollfilm holder. The 162mm normal lens is roughly equal to a 75mm lens on a 35mm camera, just right for head & shoulders. Also, the uncoated Kodak Anastigmat yields smooth skin tones and great bokeh with the lens open to f/5.6 or 8. Wonderful in open shade, both in b&w and color.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

herb

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
405
Format
Medium Format
6x9 for head and shldrs

I just sold a Horseman VHR, which will take up to a 270mm lens and all the way down to 47mm(?) or at least a 65mm and all in between.

I had one with a reflex viewer, made life really simple.
 
OP
OP

Hamster

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
202
Format
Med. Format Pan
Wow thanks guys. Seems like a bewildering array of choices.

Many here seems to suggest sheet film cameras. Would it be worthwhile to start looking into 4x5 and get a rollfilm back instead?

Does movement (swing/tilt) give you more degrees of freedom when it come to portraiture?
Actually practical with living breathing subjects?
Is it more of an asset or an hindrance?
Worth getting a crown graphic? Or shall I start with something that is more "industry standard"? Technikas?

I know I will have to work a lot slower, and composing is going to be slow as well.

Right now I am in no hurry to buy, as I have a Rollei. So I can look for good deals as they come along.
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
You might consider getting a press camera, like a Speed or Crown Graphic and a roll film adapter. This can be used anywhere easily. The view camera is more for stationary subjects and a bit less portable, although that depends on which view camera is chosen.

The press camera can function as a view camera (with fewer movements) a field camera, rangefinder camera, sport finder for fast action, use sheet or roll film, do close ups, change lens to wide angel or telephoto, and is very rugged and repairable.

JMHO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…