Thanks. I'll keep that in mind if nothing else turns up.Years ago, when I got my first RB 2x3 Graflex, I bought the wrong rollholder for it. I worked with some good machinists, so I had one of them cut a slot where I needed it. Disaster struck when I discovered I had him cut just a hair too deep, and was into the dark-slide channel, but disaster averted when I put a piece of 3M 850 tape over the area (thin, light tight, stays where you put it) and formed it to the slot. Used it like that for years, no light leaks, no flatness issues. Careful measurement of the thickness of the plate would save you from my kluge. I have found that Graflex stuff, as opposed to Graflok stuff, is getting thinner on the ground as time goes by.
Will the cut down 4x5 film fit the 2x3 sheet film backs or is the film too thick?
That's the holder that came with my RB I bought an ordinary Graphic 23 back, used that insert and used a tiny saw and files to widen the opening on the "22" original back. Worked great!Thanks. I had pretty much come to the conclusion that they were either made of unobtanium or were as rare as hens teeth since I have been looking around off an on without success. It seems that the 6x6 versions are a bit more common. I may end up picking one of those up but I really like the 6x9 negative.
I may end up just cutting some 4x5 color film down to fit the sheet film backs and start my project that way. Will the cut down 4x5 film fit the 2x3 sheet film backs or is the film too thick?
BTW, thanks for those measurements Shutterfinger. They will definitely be helpful.
I do have a couple Graphic 23s for my 4x5 and I use them but I have become quite fond of the little Baby Graflex and would love to be able to use it instead.
And I always thought that Mamiya would have conquered the world if they had sold a 6x4.5 RB that also took a 6x6 holder.My dream of a camera is a 5x7 RB
if they had sold a 6x4.5 RB that also took a 6x6 holder.
That one came with the 1948 RB Series B i bought from the original owner, a Miller racing team photographer.Thanks. I had pretty much come to the conclusion that they were either made of unobtanium or were as rare as hens teeth since I have been looking around off an on without success. It seems that the 6x6 versions are a bit more common. I may end up picking one of those up but I really like the 6x9 negative.
I have an old aerial camera back that takes 5" roll film (or maybe it was 5-1/4"-- both were aerial film sizes, and I can imagine the cursing that would accompany a mis-match), and a couple rolls of long-expired aerial film to fit. Haven't done anything with it, but have seen overpriced and oversized rigs with the same components on evilBay occasionally-- always mentioned as 'unable to test'Oh 4x5 roll film. Drooling!
Thanks. Wasn't exactly what I was looking for but film backs of any type for these cameras is useful so I put in a bid. We will see how it plays out.There is one lot of three 6X9 slotted holders on ebay today with a starting bid of $40 plus shipping.
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2060353.m570.l1313&_nkw=graflex+slotted&_sacat=0
With the exception of the slots along the side.I just double checked. Both Graphic and Graflex roll film holders for 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 are the same base dimensions.
You cut those when you cut the bottom grove.With the exception of the slots along the side.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?