645 Cropping Magic

ParkerSmithPhoto

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
As a 6x6 shooter, I had always considered 645 to be a bit of an unsexy format.

Well, fate has moved me into the Mamiya 645AFD system, and I was playing around with cropping in PS and discovered it is actually quite sexy. Just the tiniest sliver of cropping for a natural 5x7 shape, and only about 7% crop to get an 8x10 shape. See attached samples; black is the full frame.

Not bad! I hereby apologize for my previously ill 645 karma.
 

Attachments

  • 5x7-645.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 162
  • 4x5-645.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 159

brucemuir

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Messages
2,228
Location
Metro DC are
Format
Multi Format
I agree,
I eschewed the lowly 645 for years untill i wanted a quicker 120 rig.

All the BS about it not being larger enough than 135 is a laugh.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A 12 x 16 enlargement is very nice, and the 6 x 4.5 format fits it perfectly.
 

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
352
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
I shot weddings with a Pentax 645 for years.
It was perfect for 8x10s and 5x7s.
Just the slightest bit of cropping was all that was needed.
Great negs and you could print at speed!
 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
3,007
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
I'm a huge fan of the 6x4.5 format. I print full frame, 6x8" on 8x10 paper and 9x12" on 11x14 paper. They look great with 1" borders. I find the 35mm ratio too long and 4x5 and 6x7 too close to square. 6x4.5 is my favorite rectangle ratio.
 

mweintraub

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
1,730
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Medium Format
One thing I learned is that no matter what format you shoot in is to leave room. You never know what end print format you want to print to. It could be 4x6, 5x5, 5x7, 8x10, etc

Plus!: Frames will crop edges.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,481
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
brucemuir said:
I agree,
I eschewed the lowly 645 for years untill i wanted a quicker 120 rig.

All the BS about it not being larger enough than 135 is a laugh.
Click to expand...

Me too; same exact situation. Now it's largely put my 35mm gear out of work.

9x12 has the same cropping virtues in a larger negative.

-NT
 

ROL

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
795
Location
California
Format
Multi Format
ParkerSmithPhoto said:
Just the tiniest sliver of cropping for a natural 5x7 shape...
Click to expand...

I'm all for cropping to whatever composition floats your boat – I almost always crop (or shoot to crop) my 5x7 negs to 4x5, 3x5, or 1:2. But why is 5x7 a natural shape? Magazine double page spreads?
 
OP
OP

ParkerSmithPhoto

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
ROL said:
But why is 5x7 a natural shape?
Click to expand...

I don't know why it's a natural shape. It just feels good to me when I have a full length portrait in a 5x7 ratio. I like mid length and tighter portraits in a 4x5 ratio.

Does anyone know where the photo 5x7 ratio came from?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…