6 X 4.5 cm Enlargement sizes

Roses

A
Roses

  • 2
  • 0
  • 72
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 4
  • 2
  • 92
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 1
  • 0
  • 65
Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 59
Columbus Architectural Detail

A
Columbus Architectural Detail

  • 4
  • 2
  • 64

Forum statistics

Threads
197,489
Messages
2,759,848
Members
99,515
Latest member
falc
Recent bookmarks
0

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,046
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Does anyone know of a list of common sizes that 6 X 4.5 cm negatives can be enlarged to without cropping? I thought I knew a site that had this list but I cannot find it.

Thank you very much!
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,484
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
You can measure you negatives, but if you were to enlarge my negatives with an image size of 42.5 X 55mm (1.67322" x 2.16535") you can get a nice 6" x 4.5" image on an 8x10 sheet.

Since the format does not fit any standard paper size, making the border larger (as in the above example) minimizes the perception of inequality between film and format size.
 

Bob-D659

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
1,275
Location
Winnipeg, Ca
Format
Multi Format
They are close to a 4:5 aspect ratio, so they are a close fit to 4x5, 8x10, 11x14 and 16x20 paper. Print border widths make a difference too.
 

polka

Member
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
163
Format
Medium Format
The size and aspect ratio of 645 negs varies depending on the model of the camera. But you do not need to crop the images if you do not want, you may enlarge them letting a black margin all around, and after that cut the paper with or without a few millimeters of black borders (à la H.C.B.).

But on the other side, why not crop (a little), and use any aspect ratio, if to better the composition. I do it all the time, even when shooting with a square camera and prefering a rectangular framing of the picture.

Paul
 

tkamiya

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,287
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
9x12 also fits pretty well with very small amount of cropping. This is a modeling industry standard in US.

Keep in mind though, the opening of the film carrier (of enlargers) is smaller than the frame size on your film....

Unless you are printing with dirty border style, small amount of cropping is necessary. Unless you let the mask of the easel be smaller than the projected image size, you won't get the crisp white border everyone expects.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,709
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
It's about aspect ratio. 645 means 6:4.5 or 4:3.
That means that the short dimension is 0.75 times the long dimension.
Take 8x10 paper and leave a nice 1" border around the image area for a 6x8" print. 6x8 corresponds perfectly to the aspect ratio of a 645 negative.
Take 11x14 paper and again leave a nice 1" border around the image area for a 9x12" print. 9x12 also corresponds perfectly to the aspect ratio of a 645 negative.
With 16x20 you have to fudge a little, because if you must subscribe to the aspect ratio of a 645 negative, you will print a 13.5" x 18", leaving a 1" border on the short side and a 1.25" border on the long side. Close enough, if you ask me.

I like leaving a 1" border on my paper, because if you don't mount and overmat your print, the 1" border makes the print look very nice on its own.

If you don't like leaving a 1" border around the print area, then you can use 12x16" paper and print on the entire paper area and still have a perfect 3:4 aspect ratio.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom