5x4 b&w processing with a Jobo

Snapper

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2004
Messages
230
Location
Brighton, En
Format
Med. Format RF
Say I wanted get into developing my own black and white 5x4 negatives at home. I already have a Jobo CPE processor, so would it be advisable to get a 5x4 reel and use it with a 2500 series drum, but instead of going through the palaver of setting up the processor each time, just use the drum as a normal daylight tank, filling the tank almost full and giving it a few inversions/rolls every 30 seconds when developing?

Would this give good negs, or do those jobo drums need to keep rotating constantly to give even development with b&w?

I realise I'll use up more developer, but I use Rodinal at 1+50, so it's no great waste.

What about the jobo expert drums this way?
 

snallan

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
518
Location
Cambridge, U
Format
Multi Format
The Jobo drums can be used for inversion processing, as you surmise, they just need a lot of solution to fill.

For inversion processing it would be best to get a drum with the normal top, not the type with the cog. Though if you could find a big enough bung or stopper, you could get away with using a cog lid. Having both would give you the flexibility to do rotary or inversion processing.

The expert drums cannot be used on the CPEs, and, as far as I know, can only be used for rotary processing.
 

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
Using the 2309n reel would work for inversion but has snallan mentioned you would have to use a bit (a lot) more chem.
Now, no matter how you use it I would only load 4 sheets leaving the middle ones (it takes six) empty.
 
OP
OP

Snapper

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2004
Messages
230
Location
Brighton, En
Format
Med. Format RF
I've got the drum with the magnet attached, not the cog. So would this be OK?
 

dwdmguy

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
837
Location
Freehold, NJ
Format
Medium Format
I have to let someone else answer this as I only use the cog. I am 99 pct sure it's ok but don't want to lead you wrong. You'll get the answer here.
Best of luck.
 

snallan

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Messages
518
Location
Cambridge, U
Format
Multi Format
I've got the drum with the magnet attached, not the cog. So would this be OK?

Yes, that's the one. I would go with Tom's advice of only loading four sheets at time for inversion processing.
 

Willie Jan

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
950
Location
Best/The Netherlands
Format
4x5 Format
I use these tanks for a couple of years to develop 4x5 manually.
No problems.

1.2 liter goes in...
that's 12cc pyrocat A and 12cc pyrocat B

For filling the reel you maybe will need some practice. I always check after three items are inserted at one side that i feal 3 lines when i put a finger on the side (otherwise you have put 2 in the same slot. )
 

Bosaiya

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
396
Location
Sumner, Wash
Format
4x5 Format
I use Jobo's for 4x5" inversion processing with six sheets per reel, works great. I like using them because I can do a combination of inversion for developing and rotary for fixing.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
The drum with the magnet is fine, it's really the tops that are different. The cog lid doesn't fit the cap you need to close off the opening for inversion use.
I've developed 6 sheets with no problems with inversion. For the 1200ml of chem, you might as well run as many sheets as you can.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,263
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I put Sandy King's cat in my Jobo 2000 series tanks along with my 5x4 negs 1litre of deve per reel. The negatives come out perfectly but the cat's usually a bit wet

More seriously I've been processing 5x4 in a Jobo 2000 since 1976 with no problems at all, these older tanks were designed for Inversion. As others have said make sure you use the right volume for your particular tank.

I used Rodinal in my Jobo's for over 15 years and never thought it uneconomic.

Ian
 
OP
OP

Snapper

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2004
Messages
230
Location
Brighton, En
Format
Med. Format RF
Thanks for the replies. I take the point about going rotary for fixing (and I guess washing too) - I guess this would make the process more efficient and less hard work.

So now I'm thinking, why not just get the Jobo out and let it run for the 10-15 minutes for the dev and not worry about inverting every 30 seconds and put my feet up instead.

So that begs the question - what is preferable - inversion or constant agitation? Also, what effect would it have on the negs and would I need to alter the process or development times (using Rodinal 1+50 on either FP4+ or Adox CHS50 / 25) - this goes for 120 and 35mm too. If I'm doing just 120 films, would I be better off using my usual Paterson tanks with inversions every 30 secs, or put them in the Jobo and let that do the work.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…