When looking up a camera online and wanting to see a review Ken Rockwell's stuff is always near the top of the pile,with Google at least.I read the mans reviews and a lot of other reviews as well(I know,I should be out shooting myself,but sometimes......).Does anyone out there think that they are obliged to pay the $5 he asks for,for the "use" of his opinions?Is it not enough that he directs people to his favorite sites and is then rewarded by them?Just wondering.And for the record I find some of his reviews informative enough to read all the way to the bottom.Are there other sites that ask for payment for the use of their opinions?
Mike Butkus asks for a donation to support his library of user manuals. I support that.
Asking is never offensive - demanding often is.
The very splodgy, poor quality of a lot of the Butkus manuals is a continuous talking point among photographers. On some forums, particularly Pentaxforums.com, it's made a lot easier by people you get to know with their own library of manuals (in pdf form) that they are happy to share. Most of my Pentax 67 and SMC Pentax lens manuals came from just two people there.
When looking up a camera online and wanting to see a review Ken Rockwell's stuff is always near the top of the pile,with Google at least.I read the mans reviews and a lot of other reviews as well(I know,I should be out shooting myself,but sometimes......).Does anyone out there think that they are obliged to pay the $5 he asks for,for the "use" of his opinions?Is it not enough that he directs people to his favorite sites and is then rewarded by them?Just wondering.And for the record I find some of his reviews informative enough to read all the way to the bottom.Are there other sites that ask for payment for the use of their opinions?
I think if only we knew how much Mr. Rockwell makes with pay-per-click ads we would soon realize the poor guy does not need any donation...come on people!
Why diss a guy for paying his bills?
I edited my post...tapatalk goofAbsolutely, nothing against him or his work. Just saying he owns the biggest independent photographic review website and certainly generates huge numbers. We could donate to smaller businesses, that need our support much more.
I don't get this attitude towards his asking for money or for referral clicks. Why begrudge his earnings or other people's generosity to him? His site is extensive, he has a family to provide for. The material is there for all to consume at no cost. His site hits #1 on google searches because it is useful, linked to frequently and easy to read. So what is wrong with him saying ...."if you find this useful, reciprocate". (Not quoting him)
I'll give you one opinion for free: please put a space after periods and commas. It makes it much easier to read what you have to say, which I hope is your intention in writing posts.
Being read, that is.Not to be ignored.Intentionally or not, spaces have their purpose.Makingthingseasiertoread.
Ken's article on why film is better than digital sensor is a very convincing and informative read. It convinced me to switch to analogue and thus eventually ending up here at APUG. He may sound like a bit arrogant in some instances and funny. But I am with Chris and others that nothing wrong in asking for a donation.
The same time considering paying Rockwell or Butkus for their articles resp. services, we could consider asking a donation for our own contribution here at Apug. Some is very original
Instead we gift all our writing to Sean.
Yes, we also benefit from the forum. But I just wanted to bring things into another perspective.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?