4x5 lens suggestions for architectural photography

[Chuck_P]

I was going to post this in the current thread on lenses for 4x5, but thought it might be hijacking since it does not really relate to which is the best 90mm 4x5 lens.

What are your suggestions for a wide angle 4x5 lens that is good in architectural photography? I only have a Rodenstock Sironar-N 210, but it is too strong as I found out last weekend while trying to shoot some historical buildings/churches in close quarters while down town. I like the idea of the 90mm, but what about distortion? Is perhaps a 110-120mm lens a better choice for architectural shots?

Thanks
Chuck

 

[Pinholemaster]

Any lens is good for architecture when used properly for the subject.

For 4x5, I've used a 58, 65, 75, 90, 120, 150, 210, 300, 400 and a 500. All depends.

With 8x10, I've used a 120, 165, 180, 240, 311, 360, 476, 600, 645, 800 and a 1200 for architecture.

It all depends on camera to subject distance, shape of structure, whether one is shooting loose, or tight, the ability to move around near the building in question (competing buildings and terrain will dictate how far away or at what angle you'll shoot).

If you can, borrow a lens to see if you like how it sees. You need to select lenses that fit your vision, not the other way around.

 

[John Kasaian]

A lot of people use 90mm Super Angulons---there must be a reason!

 

[Trevor Crone]

I would certainly recommend the Schneider Super Symmar XL, both the 80 and the 110. The 80 has an image circle of 211mm and the 110 an image circle of 288mm. This allows for a fair amount of lens movement. They both take 67mm screw filters.

I use the 80 a lot, its light and compact and I favour the wider view in most cases for my street photography.

Regards,
Trevor.

 

[Drew B.]

A lot of people use 90mm Super Angulons---there must be a reason!

...there's your answer. I'd even try the 75mm for tight interiors.

 

[removed account4]

hi chuck

i use:
65mm sa
90mm sa
127 tominon
135 linhof
150 symmetrigon
210/370 symmar
and a 15" tele raptar ...
i switch between a rail camera and
a speed graphic depending on what needs to be done.

have fun

john

 

[Sparky]

Not to be flippant or irreverant sounding - but I actually live by the credo "as long as humanly possible" - I know it sounds contrary to what you commonly hear - but it holds utterly true for me. I greatly prefer long shots for their 'precise drawing' and graphic compression esp. with architecture. Keep in mind that "as long as possible" also means there are times when you just HAVE to use a 65 or a 58...! Especially when you need to show an entire space at one go. But I generally prefer the result of going with a longer lens than a shorter one, if space permits and all other things are, in fact, equal.

But ultimately it just comes down to trying different lengths of lens on your camera IN that particular scene. What works best for you - and why?

 

[eddym]

I use a 75mm and a 120mm, both Super Angulons. I had a 90mm, but always seemed to find it either too short or too long. But then that's my personal experience and preference; your mileage may vary.