removedacct2
Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2018
- Messages
- 366
i bought an almost full pack of 1978 "expired" Kodalith ortho type 3:
I browsed many threads on filmwasters, photo.net, largeformatphotography, rangefindersforum, and also here on photrio. Mentioned developers over the years are D-76 1+3, Deksol, D-123, Ilfosol-3, Rodinal 1+50, 1+100, 1+150, caffenol, MG paper developer. Rodinal and MG are often mentioned used with visual inspection in non-actinic red.
I have no MG developer now and it's w-e, so this will wait. Anywhy I am first interested in regular negative developer without visual inspection.
the sheets have no notches and what was mentioned in https://www.largeformatphotography....p?52172-OUCH!-Kodalith-Ortho-4x5-has-no-notch helped me be sure of the correct orientation.
Testing on a sheet, the purplish side is indeed the emulsion: color change after humidification, and scrap goes through a layer of emulsion. The curl is the hint also.
My pack had been opened so I can't confirm if it is by default, but there is a thin yellow paper under the one fold of the enveloping cardboard and the emulsion side of the sheet on top of the stack.
Anyway the curl is easy to feel in the dark. And a notch can be done on the stack with two small cuts of a sharp blade.
so, how to expose and develop?
I metered at iso 2 and used Rodinal 1+150, actually rather 7ml + 1 liter water, 1hr30' , agitation the 1st minute, then 10s at 30' and 60'
citric stop, rinse of the stop, regular acidic fixer (Fomafix) double bath.
negative is dense brownish:
but looks good under lightboks:
inverted/"printed" as regular grade 2 paper in ColorPerfect.
Lense Topcor 105mm f4.5 at f16 for 4".
I am standing in the shadow between two buildings, the half-pyramidal stairred building side is very dark/black tainted glass:
100%:
this one is botched, a double exposure. I was unsure if the shutter had triggered, and decided to take again after I checked shutter was ok and in doing so moved a bit.
But the point with this shot is that the background houses are all shades of light and mid greys. foreground kayaks are yellow and bright red.
Same Topcor-105f4.5, 8" @f22
these pictures were taken in double, so i have the two other still in the holders, and wondering what other recipe and/or developer to use for comparison and possible more optimal result. No idea how much of spectral range can be extracted,since this film anyway was meant for mechanical drawings (strong bw contrast and lines).
I have Rodinal, HC-110., Tetenal Ultrafin, XT-3, Tanol ....
I browsed many threads on filmwasters, photo.net, largeformatphotography, rangefindersforum, and also here on photrio. Mentioned developers over the years are D-76 1+3, Deksol, D-123, Ilfosol-3, Rodinal 1+50, 1+100, 1+150, caffenol, MG paper developer. Rodinal and MG are often mentioned used with visual inspection in non-actinic red.
I have no MG developer now and it's w-e, so this will wait. Anywhy I am first interested in regular negative developer without visual inspection.
the sheets have no notches and what was mentioned in https://www.largeformatphotography....p?52172-OUCH!-Kodalith-Ortho-4x5-has-no-notch helped me be sure of the correct orientation.
Testing on a sheet, the purplish side is indeed the emulsion: color change after humidification, and scrap goes through a layer of emulsion. The curl is the hint also.
My pack had been opened so I can't confirm if it is by default, but there is a thin yellow paper under the one fold of the enveloping cardboard and the emulsion side of the sheet on top of the stack.
Anyway the curl is easy to feel in the dark. And a notch can be done on the stack with two small cuts of a sharp blade.
so, how to expose and develop?
I metered at iso 2 and used Rodinal 1+150, actually rather 7ml + 1 liter water, 1hr30' , agitation the 1st minute, then 10s at 30' and 60'
citric stop, rinse of the stop, regular acidic fixer (Fomafix) double bath.
negative is dense brownish:
but looks good under lightboks:
inverted/"printed" as regular grade 2 paper in ColorPerfect.
Lense Topcor 105mm f4.5 at f16 for 4".
I am standing in the shadow between two buildings, the half-pyramidal stairred building side is very dark/black tainted glass:
100%:
this one is botched, a double exposure. I was unsure if the shutter had triggered, and decided to take again after I checked shutter was ok and in doing so moved a bit.
But the point with this shot is that the background houses are all shades of light and mid greys. foreground kayaks are yellow and bright red.
Same Topcor-105f4.5, 8" @f22
these pictures were taken in double, so i have the two other still in the holders, and wondering what other recipe and/or developer to use for comparison and possible more optimal result. No idea how much of spectral range can be extracted,since this film anyway was meant for mechanical drawings (strong bw contrast and lines).
I have Rodinal, HC-110., Tetenal Ultrafin, XT-3, Tanol ....