If the OP decides on 35mm then he has a choice of either an SLR or a RF camera.
o The problem with an SLR is viewfinder blackout just at the moment of exposure. This can be distracting to say the least especially for a newbie. To help "tune" the eye I would suggest a rangefinder as it aids in learning composition. The user is able to constantly see the subject.
o Then too SLR's usually do not show the entire frame but say 90% of it. In contrast RF's show more than the frame which can also help.
o Finally the entire frame is always in focus. I remember seeing a formal photograph. Everything was fine except there was an extension cord on the floor just visible behind the subject. Whenever I see this photo all I see is the electrical cord. Such a faux pas would be easier to spot with a RF.
The OP states that he is a beginner. It does sound as though he is contemplating buying a camera. The film and the camera are like, what should we say, you know, sort of inseparable.
That's not evidence, that's supposition. Or possibly assumption. Or possibly both.
Only the people who work at Harman can make categorical statements about what one or another film is or is not, and until they publish their trade secrets, any other statement are purely speculative.
Curves notwithstanding ...