Both slide and print film have their advantages and shortcomings. A lot depends on your personal workflow and preferences. I use slide film mostly when I know there is a real chance that I would like to project the final image. That is mostly when I go hiking in the mountains, where I like to take my lightweight and compact Agfa folding camera to take 6x6 slides on 120 film. I use Provia 100F. To see the final pictures projected on a wall is quite impressive. In all other cases I prefer print film, as it gives me the possibility to do my own optical printing, which I enjoy immensly and which is not possible anymore with slide film; print film also means more flexibility with exposure, which is something I enjoy, as it is liberating not to be forced to think about exposure all the time while photographing. Of course you have to interpret the negative when you print it. But for me that is not a problem, it is part of the fun. From a purely technical standpoint (resolution/grain) print film might be inferior to slide film, but in the real world, modern print films, even the consumer grade flavors, give you stunning results when printed optically. There is also more variety in speed and tonal palette among print film then slide film nowadays. OTOH, for a beginner to (analog) photography slide film makes sense as it gives you immediate and distinct feedback in cases of user error. You don't have to worry if it was you that runied the shot or the lousy automated lab print.