35mm lens for screw thread camera

Amsterdam protest

A
Amsterdam protest

  • 0
  • 0
  • 15
Service Entrance

A
Service Entrance

  • 1
  • 1
  • 41
Trash and razor wire

A
Trash and razor wire

  • 1
  • 0
  • 32
Bicycles chained

Bicycles chained

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
Tubas in the Park

A
Tubas in the Park

  • 1
  • 0
  • 28

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,858
Messages
2,765,808
Members
99,488
Latest member
colpe
Recent bookmarks
1

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
I'm new to M39 thread cameras, and recently bought a Voigtlander Bessa. I reckon 90% of what I do could be covered by a 35mm lens, but which to choose? Will Russian glass fit the bill, if so which model should I look for? I intend shooting black and white exclusively on the Bessa.
 

hamradio

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
58
Format
Med. Format RF
I haven't tried it myself, but I hear the Jupiter 12 35/2.8 with its very large rear element will interfere with the Bessa.

If you have a little more to throw down, it'd be hard to go wrong with a used Color-Skopar 35/2.5.
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
Russian glass can be good, but quality control in Russia was definitely Job 2, with "meet the production quota" being Job 1. I've read of folks who had to go through two or three of those Russian things before finding the one built on Wednesday (no hangovers, nobody drunk).

If you are serious, Cosina/Voigtlander lenses are excellent. Vintage Canon glass is also very, very good, as is Leica, of course.
 
OP
OP

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
Any opinions on the 3.5 Industar? I saw good results from one, is that typical or should I avoid? Duh, it's a 50....!
 

Lamar

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
375
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
35mm
There are a lot of posts on the forums that say the Jupiter 12 rear element will hit the shutter on the Voigtlander RF's and there just not a way to rectify the problem. I can use mine on a Canon 7 but the interference potential is at the top baffle and very edge of the rear element such that the baffle can be tweaked just a bit to allow for use without contact.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Russian glass can be good, but quality control in Russia was definitely Job 2, with "meet the production quota" being Job 1. I've read of folks who had to go through two or three of those Russian things before finding the one built on Wednesday (no hangovers, nobody drunk).

If you are serious, Cosina/Voigtlander lenses are excellent. Vintage Canon glass is also very, very good, as is Leica, of course.

OK, my sample size is essentially none. But, I have a 1961 Arsenal built Jupiter 12 that is just lovely. From mid 50s to mid 60s, that is during the Kruschev years, a good deal of pride was taken in the quality of manufactured goods. Also, Arsenal had one of the better reputations for QC.
Unfortunately, my J-12 is Contax mount - Arsenal didn't make any 39mm screwmount lenses AFIK - and anyway a J-12 won't mount on a Bessa. :pouty:
 
OP
OP

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
What's your budget?
Flexible, within reason. I'm looking for a point and shoot, zone focus, f8 and tweak the shutter, black and white Tri-X at 800ISO, lens. Good resolution, stellar optics I can live without, same for wide apertures. f2.8 to f4 max. Going a little wider, will the Industar 28mm 2.8 fit the Bessa? Is that a half frame lens? You can see my knowledge level on screw threads lenses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Flexible, within reason. I'm looking for a point and shoot, zone focus, f8 and tweak the shutter, black and white Tri-X at 800ISO, lens. Good resolution, stellar optics I can live without, same for wide apertures. f2.8 to f4 max. Going a little wider, will the Industar 28mm 2.8 fit the Bessa? Is that a half frame lens? You can see my knowledge level on screw threads lenses.

Yes, although it is often flogged as otherwise. It was the standard lens for the Chaika half frame.
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
The vintage Canon/Serenar 35 f2.8 is a good lens affordably priced.

The Jupiter 12 is very good, but the big rear element is said to interfere with the Bessa shutter.
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
The vintage Canon/Serenar 35 f2.8 is a good lens affordably priced.

The less expensive Jupiter 12 is very good, but the big rear element is said to interfere with the Bessa shutter.

At around $300, the leitz Summaron 35 f3.5 is very nice.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
From Cameraquest site:

https://www.cameraquest.com/ltmlens.htm

35 mm

35/1.5 Canon The fastest lens for the 35 LTM. not the sharpest. black only

35/1.7 Voigtlander Ultron: announced June 1999, available 8/1/99. Modern design, 6 groups in 8 elements, with one aspherical surface. 10 diaphragm blades, rangefinder coupled. One of the best LTM lenses ever made. Made by Cosina for their Voigtlander Bessa L.

35/1.8 Nikkor: This lens is rare and fast, and the most plentiful of the super speed LTM 35's faster than f/2. A good shooter, but hard to find. black/chrome only

35/2 Leitz Summicron ASPH August 1999 Amazingly Leica is releasing a limited production screw mount just for the Japanese market, chrome only. These are sure to become instant collector's items, and are doubtless the sharpest 35's ever made in LTM mount. Alas, inexpensive they are not.

35/2 Canon Black: the last and best of Canon's 35mm lenses

35/2 Leitz Summicron(1958-1962) : a very rare and expensive classic lens for the collector, most made in M mount. chrome only. Watch out for fogging and cleaning scratches.

35/2.5 "Compact" and "Pancake" Voigtlanders introduced in 2000, optics the same in both. The compact version is built in the small 25/4 barrel, with a convenient focusing lever. The pancake version is misnamed in my eyes, a conventional focusing barrel but too big to be a true pancake lens.

35/2.5 Nikkor: in chrome or the later black versions. A very sharp lens. chrome and black/chrome versions

35/2.8 or 3.5 Canon: or Serenar. OK but not great reputations, chrome or black versions

35/2.8 Russian: a copy of the pre-war Zeiss Biogon. Low priced but spotty quality control.

35/3.5 Leitz Elmar(1930-1950) : Prewar versions uncoated, coated postwar. See above comments on the delights of uncoated lenses. Earliest lenses Nickel, most chrome. Watch out for fogging and cleaning scratches.

35/3.5 Nikkor: in chrome or the later black. the most numerous 35 LTM Nikkor

35/3.5 Leitz Summaron (1949-1960): OK but not outstanding. Watch out for fogging and cleaning scratches.
 

Fotoguy20d

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
1,252
Location
NJ
Format
4x5 Format
Jupiter 12 will not work with a Bessa R - I have a 12 listed here in the classifieds and it does not work with my R. The Summaron 35/3.5 is a nice lens if you can find one without haze - that's what Im using on my M3. From my testing, I didnt see much if any difference between the Jupiter and the Summaron, especially around f8.

Dan
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
Jupiter 12 will not work with a Bessa R - I have a 12 listed here in the classifieds and it does not work with my R. The Summaron 35/3.5 is a nice lens if you can find one without haze - that's what Im using on my M3. From my testing, I didnt see much if any difference between the Jupiter and the Summaron, especially around f8.

Dan

At f/8 I don't think you see any significant difference of any of the lenses above...
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
I think the CV35f2.5 is available within your budget. It's a very modern and sharp lens. The Summaron would have more character.
 

pete hogan

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
10
Location
Southern Cal
Format
35mm RF
Leica made the ltm Summaron 35 f/3.5 to do what you want to do, zone focus or hyperfocal at f/11, flat field, and they advertised it that way in '54. I got a nice BGN one and a hood from KEH this year for the cost you're considering.
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
In the recent past, I've owned and used these 35mm lenses
Jupiter 12 f2.8
CV f2.5
Summaron f2.8 Goggled M3 version
Summaron F2.8 M2 version
Summaron f3.5
Serenar f2.8
Canon f2

Still have the last one.
 

randy6

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
147
Location
Florida
Format
Multi Format
Sometimes you can find m39 mount 35mm canon glass at good prices maybe a better choice then russian nikkor makes a good 35mm in m39 . I think the Russian rear element will hit the back of the shutter in a bessa
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
One more not mentioned that I currently have mounted on my IIIf is the 35/3.5 W. Acall Kyoei lens. A good lens with very nice performance and character. Not always easy to find but they're out there. More expensive if sold with the sometimes included hood and viewfinder:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/hewlbane/sets/72157635830006554/
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom