Is there anything wrong with the OM-4Ti?
The lens, including zooms available for it are some of the best for 35mm.
Is the grass greener...?
You got me there!
But, who keeps telling me I don't need more OMs?
I'm trying to learn my lesson.
I need 30 Hail Marys.
Olympus OM-1N, OM-2N, OM-4, OM10
I usually gasp at the thought of zooms.
No connection to seller but how about the 28-48mm f/4 zoom?
I just found out about it and have been curious about how it might fare.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/25203947729...99&_trkparms=gh1g=I252039477290.N36.S1.R2.TR3
Vivitar Series 1, 28-90 f/2.8-3.5 zoom ROCKS!
my zoom experience is limited to the Nikkor 35-70f/3.5-4.5?.and compared to the 80mm Zeiss Planar it just can't measure up(no surprise to anyoneI hope) but it is decent at f5.6-11 through out the image circle and better than the old 43-86mm zoom, which was terrble.according to Rockwell, newer Nikkor zooms are better and have come closer to prime performance.I use a prime wherever I can.I take weight over mediocre perfprmance anytime.One benefit of DSLRs is that you get an idea about lens erformance quicklyI'm looking for a standard zoom lens +/- 35-70mm range and potentially a new body to go along with it. I currently use the OM system and would be carrying around with me a lovely OM-4ti. This is a near perfect camera for me. If I were to stick with this body, It would look like a 35-70 f3.6 would be the lens to carry around with it. The 2.8 is way too expensive (and a bit big).
After always being intrigued by the Contax SLRs, I've always thought that the Aria with the 35-70 f3.4 would be really nice to have. *Retail therapy alarms going off?*
First off, any experiences with either of these lenses? Both perhaps? Is one significantly better than the other? They both claim to be comparable to their primes. Keep in mind, my only experience with any Zeiss lens is an 80mm Planar on a Hassy And yeah, it's impeccable. I must say, I'm very impressed with my Olympus lenses. Comparing apple and oranges here, right ? But Zeiss, I guess, is known for their great lenses on any format.
What would you do? Save a few bucks (cost of Contax body about $200-300). Or should I be a little adventurous and give a new system a shot? My overall concern is image quality and portability. I have never seen an Aria and the lenses seem to be about the same size. I can't seem to find a size comparison of these two bodies and/or lenses
Any other suggestions? The only thing need that I haven't already mentioned is a built-in spot meter.
To wrap things up, I'm looking for:
-Image quality on a standard zoom
-Built in Spot meter
-Relatively lightweight and portable
-Not crazy expensive
I usually gasp at the thought of zooms.
No connection to seller but how about the 28-48mm f/4 zoom?
I just found out about it and have been curious about how it might fare.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/252039477290?_trksid=p2045573.m570.l5999&_trkparms=gh1g%3DI252039477290.N36.S1.R2.TR3
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?