35mm disposable cameras. what's their strength?

[ongakublue]

OK so maybe some of you will just dismiss single use cameras as rubbish and not even want to entertain the notion a good picture can be taken with one, but for those who do, you can read on. I am going to pick up one of those Ilford single use cameras for an upcoming trip. For fun as much as anything but I would like to know what is to be avoided. For example, the aperture is pretty small so portraits with nice bokeh is I guess ruled out. Any tips or ideas from the use of these?

Cheers!


J

 

[Ricardo Miranda]

There's nothing wrong with using these cameras.
Yes, they are better used within certain conditions, especially regarding light, but they can be fun to use, In fact, wasn't there a series of some disposables labelled "Fun"?

 

[RobC]

I would suggest that you try and keep sky out of images, i.e. closed landscape backgrounds so that dynamic range of subject is limited to maybe 5 stops. That will give the basic (non existant) metering the best chance of producing a decent image.

 

[Sirius Glass]

There is nothing wrong with the disposable camera, however the Kodak disposable cameras have the best optics.

 

[Theo Sulphate]

A car-club friend of mine, who knows nothing about cameras (and doesn't want to know, either) would always buy these. He took photos of cars on display and got an extremely good car-to-car shot of me driving. So, they can produce good results within limitations.

His observations to me at the time were:

- viewfinder is conservative - he would back up to ensure everything was in the shot, only to discover the print showed a wider area. Basically, I'd say be wary of viewfinder inaccuracy.

- the flash always fired - so, be wary of reflective surfaces

I don't know if he bought the Kodak or Fuji cameras.

 

[John51]

Some people keep one in their car in case they need photographic evidence after an accident. Film images being trusted more than digital.

 

[OzJohn]

Some people keep one in their car in case they need photographic evidence after an accident. Film images being trusted more than digital.

C'mon, why would you need to keep any sort of camera in your car? How many people drive around today without a phone that can also take photos? OzJohn

 

[gone]

I Like the idea fine, but the two times I used them (a regular Kodak disposable, and a water proof one), the pictures were shockingly soft, even at small enlargements. On the other hand, the plastic lenses on my Holga and Diana made very sharp pictures, especially the Diana. So that would be my concern. You have to put a piece of electrical tape over the flashes.

I don't drive, and my cell phone is just a phone, which is why I carry a Konica C35 :] I'm going to ditch the phone soon too, just like we did w/ the TV.

 

[Theo Sulphate]

C'mon, why would you need to keep any sort of camera in your car? How many people drive around today without a phone that can also take photos? OzJohn

Just like in Sov^H^H^H Russia, we will soon need to drive with video to show the situation leading up to the accident. It's also a good way to capture inbound objects from space.

 

[frank]

Strength of disposable cameras is disposability.

 

[ericdan]

There is nothing wrong with the disposable camera, however the Kodak disposable cameras have the best optics.

I regularly shoot disposables and found that Fuji QuickSnap as well as Kodak's are actually surprisingly good.
They do have some distortion but it's hardly noticable.
The Fuji has a much much better, super bright viewfinder. Shutter and flash operation is much smoother than kodak.
Ilford HP5 disposable I've only shot once and really enjoyed it but I find Color negative is easier to shoot in disposables than B/W film.

 

[Sirius Glass]

C'mon, why would you need to keep any sort of camera in your car? How many people drive around today without a phone that can also take photos? OzJohn

My cell phone is exactly just that a cell phone. No camera. No texting. Just a cell phone. Get over it.

 

[Theo Sulphate]

Eeeek!

http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/quicksnap.htm

 

[markbarendt]

Any tips or ideas from the use of these?

1-Put the camera in your shirt pocket and stop thinking about it, just enjoy the day. If something strikes your fancy pull the camera out of your shirt pocket, compose and click very quickly.
2-Wind the camera, put it back in your shirt pocket.

Repeat as needed.

If the camera is out of your pocket for more than say 10 seconds including winding, that could be a sign that you are overthinking things.

 

[Alan Gales]

When my cousin got married they had all these Kodak disposable cameras sitting at the reception tables. When we were done we turned them them into the bride and groom. My cousin said that she and her husband loved the photographs and they were cherished just as much as the professional photographs. Pretty neat!

 

[Sirius Glass]

And then people wonder why a photographer cannot earn a decent living.

 

[albada]

OzJohn wrote: "Just like in Sov^H^H^H Russia..."

Ah, the sign of an old computer geek. Good for you.
For those who don't know, ^H means pressing control-H on the keyboard, which is Backspace on old terminals, used to erase a mistake.
Only OzJohn didn't make a mistake.

Mark Overton

 

[John Bragg]

Lose one and it is not the end of the world.

 

[Theo Sulphate]

OzJohn wrote: "Just like in Sov^H^H^H Russia..."

Ah, the sign of an old computer geek. Good for you.
For those who don't know, ^H means pressing control-H on the keyboard, which is Backspace on old terminals, used to erase a mistake.
Only OzJohn didn't make a mistake.

Mark Overton

That was me who wrote that, not Ozjohn.

"Writing under erasure" used to be common in printed satire as well, with a dashed-out text being perfectly visible.

In many of the Usenet forums in the 1980's-1990's, the deliberate use of ^H to simulate writing under erasure was funny because it mimicked an unsophisticated forum poster who hadn't gotten his terminal settings correct in the termcap file, thereby revealing his original (and more embarrassing) text to others, but not to him.

 

[removed account4]

1-Put the camera in your shirt pocket and stop thinking about it, just enjoy the day. If something strikes your fancy pull the camera out of your shirt pocket, compose and click very quickly.
2-Wind the camera, put it back in your shirt pocket.

Repeat as needed.

If the camera is out of your pocket for more than say 10 seconds including winding, that could be a sign that you are overthinking things.

+1

 

[cramej]

OK so maybe some of you will just dismiss single use cameras as rubbish and not even want to entertain the notion a good picture can be taken with one, but for those who do, you can read on. I am going to pick up one of those Ilford single use cameras for an upcoming trip. For fun as much as anything but I would like to know what is to be avoided. For example, the aperture is pretty small so portraits with nice bokeh is I guess ruled out. Any tips or ideas from the use of these?

Cheers!


J

A strength is that they're not really disposable. Just pop it open, remove already rewound cassette, load new cassette in a dark room and keep on going. The battery should last at least another few rolls before needing to be replaced. Just be careful of the flash capacitor when you open it (ouch - speaking from personal experience )

 

[blockend]

There are plenty of reusable, plastic lens, fixed focus, single aperture cameras for 99p. They'll give identical rendering and you won't have to dump them after one go.

 

[ericdan]

For example which one?


Sent from Tapatalk

 

[ericdan]

A strength is that they're not really disposable. Just pop it open, remove already rewound cassette, load new cassette in a dark room and keep on going. The battery should last at least another few rolls before needing to be replaced. Just be careful of the flash capacitor when you open it (ouch - speaking from personal experience )

Cannot reload them that easily. The film canisters are slightly different. The film wind wheel grabs onto the spool. It can't do that on normal cassettes


Sent from Tapatalk

 

[blockend]

For example which one?


Sent from Tapatalk

Look for brands like Kodak or Hanimex, but there are plenty more including ones built by the big camera brands. An Olympus Shoot and Go would fit the bill. Some have automated film advance, I prefer a thumb wheel. A flash is essential. They usually come with a 3-element plastic lens and a Waterhouse stop of around f10. The build quality is only a notch above disposable but they have the all important door on the back.

They are thinner on the ground than they used to be because most people threw them away for zoom lensed 35mm cameras, then similar digitals. As they were made by the million there are still a lot out there.