Not if you focus manually and use a wire-frame at focal plane.At that range, parallax issues in framing and AF make point & shoots hit & miss.
True dat, but a wire frame comes with issues of its own. It is certainly very useful for scientific work where you need a fixed magnification.Not if you focus manually and use a wire-frame at focal plane.
Does anyone have any suggestions or recommendations for such a camera?
1:1 macro magnification is not crucial, just the ability to focus (AF ideally) at very close range - 30cm or less, let's say.
I have big cameras I can do great macro work with - but they are really big, clumsy, heavy and slow to use (a medium format TLR, a large format plate camera, and of course reversing rings and extension tubes for my 35mm SLRs). But I could do with something pocketable and quick to use, so I can throw it in my bag when hiking and not worry about the weight / slowing down my walking party.
Been googling this for ages, and nothing seems to come up other than suggestions about reversing rings / ext tubes, or d*****l cameras
If 35mm is your film choice look to getting hold of a Pentax 35mm and their 100mm macro lens. Great 'flat field' images. I used it when I first started as a 'Pro' in Biological photography those many years ago.
But if you use wire frame the camera is no longer compact.Not if you focus manually and use a wire-frame at focal plane.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?