. . . My own feeling is the Leicas didn't mature until the IIIf & g and the M series was already in the pipeline evolving fron the IV prototypes made before WWII.
Ian
You joke. I know you know the Rolleiflex is 120/ 6x6. Barnack was one of the first 35mm designers. The designer of the Ihagee Kine Prakitca is in the running too. Modern cameras are still based on his design.
I have a Leica IIIc (1942) and have been using it as my primary camera.
Kent in SD
Zeiss Ikon designed the Nikon RF cameras so nothing innovative there apart from slight modifications. The Nikon F is essentially a rangefinder with a mirror box, just as the Zenit C (S) was 4 years earlier. The irony is modern Bessa and similar rangefinders from the same factory are based on a Cosina SLR minus the mirror box and prism.
Innovative designs where the Prakitana and very early East German made Contax acemeras and then the Pentax S.
My own feeling is the Leicas didn't mature until the IIIf & g and the M series was already in the pipeline evolving fron the IV prototypes made before WWII.
Ian
No! My vote would go to Dr Nagel of Contessa Nagel, Zeiss Ikon and Kodak fame.Was Oskar Barnack the best 35mm camera designer of all time?
there was an agfa tourist or something like that that gave 100 shots per roll
It was the "Tourist Multiple" from 1913. Not from Agfa but from a US manufacturer:
Dead Link Removed
It was the "Tourist Multiple" from 1913. Not from Agfa but from a US manufacturer:
http://historical-cameras.blogspot.de/2008/11/herbert-huesgen-tourist-multiple.html
I'd call that titanium shutter pretty innovative.
I thought the Contax was over designed into extinction???
The shutters look like a good idea on paper but were very complicated to work on.
Why?
i am rather fond of the sept by debris
7 uses, 1 camera
argus ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?