300mm Rodenstock Sironar S and N vs. Symmar

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 17
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 2
  • 31
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 39

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,826
Messages
2,781,479
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

Tom Stanworth

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
2,021
Format
Multi Format
I cannot imagine that there would be any discernable difference. Coverage for both is vast and resolution far beyond what you would likely need. At shooting apertures (assuming field use) both likely to be diffraction limited at f32/45. Buy the cheapest.
 

Huib

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2002
Messages
30
Location
NL-Limburg
Format
Plastic Cameras
Jack,

Equal performers if you ask me. Maybe the -S is better than a -N but in real-life use that probably diminishes.

fwiw: besides buying the cheapest, also consider the weight...I was surprised how heavy 1,5Kg is...

Huib
 
OP
OP
JackRosa

JackRosa

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
447
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
Thank you for your insight

Gets: Thank you for providing your insight. It is much appreciated.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom