220 Backs with 120 film

OP
OP

LMNOP

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
475
Location
Vermont
Format
Medium Format
Damn. Looks like I'll be seeking out some 220 film. I'm willing to try 120 because there were some firm believers that this would work fine, including my KEH sales rep. I'll have to learn for myself as nobody seems to have concrete examples of this in practice. Thanks for weighing in!
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,177
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format


Oh, I've tried it as an experiment. And it worked fine. It is just that there are concerns about:
1) being misled by the counter - I rely on the clear indication that the 120 back gives you when you finish the roll; and
2) that heavy use may cause accelerated wear on the back.

In addition, the spacing is a little bit different. If you use 120 in the 220 back, you may want to experiment a bit with the "Start" marker on the film in order to achieve the right amount of unused film before and after the shots themselves.
 
OP
OP

LMNOP

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
475
Location
Vermont
Format
Medium Format

Yeah I don't mind stopping at 10 frames, then advancing the film until it's wound. I don't imagine myself doing this over 20 rolls, I am pursuing a 120 back. 220 may be useful for the first roll so I can bracket exposures and get to know this beast. I've been a 645 guy for a long time so this is an experiment of sorts.
 
OP
OP

LMNOP

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
475
Location
Vermont
Format
Medium Format
UPDATE:

Ran a roll of Portra 400 120 through the 220 back - seems to work fine. I shot through frame 10, and advanced through the rest. The negatives look decent, although I have some adjustments to make getting to know this camera.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…