After a decade, the situation will have probably resolved itself one way or another. But I came across this thread as I've been exploring the polychrome/2-bath lith thing a bit over the past few days.
For those who are still searching: a fairly accessible alternative to the Moersch Siena developer is the metol version he describes in the first polychrome pdf on his website. I've been playing with it a bit lately and it seems to work, although quite a bit of tweaking is required to match the chemistry to the paper. Also, I'm sure the real thing (using glycin instead of metol) yields better colors, but metol is just a little easier to get hold of.
These are some of my attempts so far:
Untoned; Fomatone MG:
Selenium-toned, Fomatone MG:
Selenium-toned, Adox Variotone:
Fomatone seems to like a very dilute second 'polychrome' developer; much more so than any other paper I've tried so far. I ended up using the metol formula published by Moersch without the bromide and chloride mixed into the stock, diluted at about 1+100 (the pdf says up to 1+10, but this is far too strong for Fomatone even if the prescribed bromide is included) and with extra ammonium and/or sodium chloride added.
One thing I have not been able to figure out is to get a polychrome print to tone in selenium to the bluish/purple hue reported by Moersch back in 2003 on Fomabrom (I believe that paper has since been reformulated). If anyone has experience with that particular approach and result, I'd be all ears...