180/2,8AIS+TC201 sharper than 300/4,5 AIS?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,356
Messages
2,790,237
Members
99,881
Latest member
Vlad06
Recent bookmarks
0

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
I tried some bird photography some days ago and wasn't quite satisfied but hey low light levels, big apperture and long shutterspeeds etc.
So yesterday I did an informal nonscientific comparison between my 180mm F2,8 ais on TC 201 and 300mm f/4,5 trying to keep effective aperture and shutterspeed the same and using a sb 26 to light the subject (some logs used as feeding place for the birds)
I found that the 180 on 2X converter made way sharper images with a lot more details than the 300mm @5,6 to 11, both handheld but rested on soft but firm support (the 300 lacks its tripod collar)
Can anybody confirm this or should I retry and standardize setup even more?
I know my 180 performs really good alone and I would expect the TC201 should degrade its performance but not that the 300mm f/4,5 did that bad.
Best regards
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
You could attach 300mm f4,5 on TC 201 and see how much degradation you get. 180mm is a superb lens, and that teleconverter is great also, I would not expect big visible degradation from 180mm + TC201. 300mm f4,5 is good, but not legendary, plus maybe you have bad condition sample.
 
OP
OP

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
So my findings are not unlikely? Ok.
Which great teles in the 300-400mm range (Nikon, Canon FD, Minolta Olympus...........) would you recommend?
E.g. the 400mm f/4,5 FD is not that expensive.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
If you want IQ in a 300mm you need the tripod collar, cable release and a tripod that is a solid concrete mass.
 
OP
OP

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
If you want IQ in a 300mm you need the tripod collar, cable release and a tripod that is a solid concrete mass.

Yeah I know and Id like a tripod collar option for the 180 as well. I just found it odd that it (the 180) do better with the TC201 (360mm effective) than the 300 alone under the same conditions. Seems Ill go with the 180/TC201 combo for the time being.
 
OP
OP

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
Btw some years ago I tried my tripods and tripod heads out using my P6X7 and a laser pointer and found out the head is more important than tripod weight in reducing the effect from mirror slap. I used a Novo classic ball (a big one borrowed), a Mannfrotto 3 way head (RC 441?) the 055CLB and the 058. It didn't matter which tripod I used but there was a huge difference between the heads. The ballhead was the better of the two.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom