150mm lens for Bronica SQ-A

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 1
  • 0
  • 10
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 23
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 167
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 163

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,231
Members
99,711
Latest member
Ramajai
Recent bookmarks
0

mkiernan

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
80
Location
NSW, Austral
Format
35mm
I would likw some advice about a 150mm lens for a Bronica SQ-A. I currently have one lens only, an 80mm standard lens. I have the chance of buying a 150mm lens (but because it is by mail-order, cannot try it out on my camera). I would like to have a telephoto lens for portrait and some landscape work, but don't know how much advantage a 150mm is over my current 80mm. If my maths is correct, a 150mm on 6x6 is equivalent (in magnification) to a 90mm on 35mm. Should I be looking for something larger, or is 150mm a good asset for portrait/landscale in medium format?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Regards
Michael
 

wildbill

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
2,828
Location
Grand Rapids
Format
Multi Format
I've got the 150mm for mine and it's minimum focus is decent for portraits. I paid $66 on ebay for it. Great lens. pretty compact. i think finding a longer focal length will be more difficult as they don't seem to be as common.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
345
Location
Datchet, Ber
Format
Medium Format
I think the majority of people who have a series of lenses for their Bronica 6x6 will include the 150. Its been a popular lens as the number for sale on eBay will testify. Mine has certainly seen plenty of use over the years for lansdscape/abstract use and the image quality and character are just fine. For portraits it focuses down to 1.5m (5 feet) which gives a field of about 18" sq. This is about the same as you can achieve with your 80mm at closest focus, though obviously it gets you further away from the subject. In short it will help you photograph from a better place but it won't help you get in tighter.
 

DaveOttawa

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
285
Location
Ottawa, Cana
Format
35mm RF
What about the 180mm?

You might want to look as well at the 180mm, close focus distance is 1 meter / 39 inches, angle of view comparable to a 105mm in small format.
I faced the same dilemma with my SQB and eventually decided on the 180mm, downside is they are rarer and more expensive than 150.
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,931
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
If you want the same minimum focus and don't mind a loss of aperture the 2x teleconverter would do you well especially if you don't shoot that often. Plus when you get another lens in that range the converter will help expand that one too. A short extension tube is also handy for getting in a little closer.
 

Peter Black

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 19, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Scotland, UK
Format
Multi Format
I think the 150 is the way to go on price compared with the 180, although I've never used the 180. I did have a 200 but the minimum focus isn't very good for portrait work and the dof at minimum focus was tiny. I believe the minimum focus on the 180 was a lot closer to the 150 than the 200, so the dof shouldn't be a problem.
 
OP
OP

mkiernan

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2005
Messages
80
Location
NSW, Austral
Format
35mm
Thankyou everyone who responded. On the basis of this I will probably run with the 150 as it is available (I am really restricted to second hand). I will also keep an eye out for the other options.

Regards
Michael K
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom