• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

100asa b/w film

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,770
Messages
2,829,863
Members
100,936
Latest member
rdbirt
Recent bookmarks
1

Harry Lime

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
495
Format
35mm RF
I shoot Tri-X 99% of the time, but an upcoming project would really benefit from shooting some 100asa stock. Only problem is that I am mostly ignorant of slow speed films. I used to shoot a little APX100 and Plus-X about 8 years ago, but it's all a dark memory.

Therefore I have a few questions.

Do the modern films like TMAX100 and Delta100 have as much range as the more traditional films? Think Tri-X vs Tmax400-2. IME Tri-X certainly holds the highlights better. In that case would the better choice be something like Plus-X or FP4, at the expense of a little more grain? Tonality is my priority, over grain.

I've considered ADOX (art100), but I'm not sure if they have even more grain than Plus-X/Fp4, which would defeat the whole point.

Normally I would do some testing, but I'm pressed for time...

thanks
 

Christopher Walrath

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
I get seven stops range with TMax. Never shot a roll of Ilford in my life so I can't speak to that but I suspect it is the same. The only difference I have ever noticed is the need for a tripod in more dull/low light situations due only to film speed.
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,421
Location
glens falls, ny USA
Format
Multi Format
IMO, yes, the better choice would be PX or FP-4. APX 100 is still available on ebay, but prices are up there.

I've never cared for the tonality of t-grained films and when I stopped using them and went back to trad-grain, it was like using a new camera and lenses.

PX is often called Tri-X's little brother. I'd agree. You can actuallybuy Freestyle's Arista Premium brand, (but you're in the UK, right?) which is TX and PX under private label.

D-76/ID-11 is always good for these films.
 

Andrew Horodysky

I agree with Jim; Plus-X or FP-4+ would be the way to go. D-76/1:1 or XTOL/1:1, the latter affording a little more perceived sharpness.
 
OP
OP
Harry Lime

Harry Lime

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
495
Format
35mm RF
I was leaning towards Plus-X. It's fingerprint is very much in the Kodak/Tri-X family, which would make it easier to match prints for a photo story.

From what I remember Plus-X had a really long center and lot's of headroom in the highlights, which should make it really good for portraits (or snow).
 

aparat

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
1,177
Location
Saint Paul,
Format
35mm
You should get great success with most 100 ISO films available today. My personal favorite is Fomapan 100 for a more traditional look.
 

CuS

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
144
Format
35mm
APX100, Plus-X or Acros for me

I luckily still have a couple of 100' rolls of APX100 (my main film). But of these three, I would have to say that Plus-X is my favoite folowed closely by Fuji Acros.

I like APX100 and Plus-X best in Rodinal (1+25) and Acros (as well as all the neopan films) in HC-110.
 

RobertV

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
897
Location
the Netherla
Format
Multi Format
APX100 and Fomapan 100 are pretty close to each other in Rodinal. It's a pity the fiirst film is running out of the last worldwide available stocks.

Recommended APX100 iso 80 or Fomapan 100 iso 80 in Rodinal 1+25 or 1+50.

Acros 100 will only give iso 64 with the Rodinal combination. I prefer Acros 100 in Beutler (iso 100). It's the finest grain iso 100 film IMO.

Good luck with your choice!

Robert
 

fschifano

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
There's no question really. If you like the look of Tri-X, then Plus-X is the slower alternative. Nothing wrong with any of the other films mentioned, but Plus-X is special. Give it a shot and I think you'll agree.
 

2F/2F

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
If you like the general look of Tri-X, but want it to be slower, I'd just go for Plus-X. It doesn't look just like Tri-X, but it and Tri-X do go hand in hand, as they are the only two Kodak films without "T-grained" emulsions.

(Better yet: Go for Arista Premium 100 for the slow film, and Arista Premium 400 for the fast film.)
 

liquid695

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
51
Location
Concon, Chil
Format
Multi Format
Rollei Retro 100 is the last stock of AGFA APX 100 re branded according my sources. You can find rollei retro film in Freestyle
 
OP
OP
Harry Lime

Harry Lime

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
495
Format
35mm RF
Thanks everyone. I think I'll stay in the Kodak family and go with good old Plus-X.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom