10" Commercial Ektar Lens In Copal Shutter?

Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 4
  • 3
  • 50
Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 83
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 68
High st

A
High st

  • 10
  • 0
  • 98

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,231
Messages
2,788,257
Members
99,837
Latest member
Agelaius
Recent bookmarks
2

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
I know it can be custom done but I'll never understand why one would choose the Copal seven blade aperture over the nice round Ilex. At any rate, I just bought a 10" Commercial Ektar mounted in a Copal #3-S shutter. The front cell uses an adapter but the rear cell screws straight in. Out of curiosity I tried to move the cells to an Ilex #4 but they don't fit.

This is a 1961 model Ektar lens. There are no custom markings on the shutter body, cells or the adapter.

QUESTION #!: Did E.K. ever factory-mount their Commercial Ektar lenses in Copal shutters?

QUESTION #2: If they didn't is there any way to determine who did the work?

I'm trying to determine whether or not I should keep it. It arrived with far more cosmetic damage than was indicated in the auction. It's functionally sound though.... unless there's an issue with cell mismatch or misalignment.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,594
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
... I'll never understand why one would choose the Copal seven blade aperture over the nice round Ilex ...

I'll never understand that either. The Ilex is a swell shutter.

Re Q#1: I'm no expert in that area but I don't think so.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,594
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Oh... one thing I do remember hearing is that the Eastman Kodak Ilex were different from the "regular" Ilex. That could be why it didn't fit.
 
OP
OP

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
I've been pondering the idea of having the Ektar cells re-fitted to a #4 Ilex and using the Copal 3-S for a 305mm Computar because it's a direct fit. But... I really want the Computar more and having one fit into an Ilex #5 with a nice round aperture shouldn't cost any more than having the Ektar re-fitted.
 
OP
OP

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
These pics might help clear things up a bit...

Front View...
DSCN6940.jpg

All Apart (front adapter to the upper-right)
DSCN6941.jpg

Front Cell Screwed Into Front Adapter
DSCN6943.jpg

Rear Cell Is Direct Fit Into the Copal 3-S
(is not screwed all the way in)
DSCN6942.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mark Crabtree

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
782
Format
Large Format
I looks like the rear cell does have an adapter to reduce the diameter, but maybe the pictures are deceiving.

As mentioned above. Illex shutters made for Kodak lenses have different threads than the standard ones. You would need an Illex originally made for the lens. That's going to be tough to find unless you stumble onto a really trashed Ektar in shutter.
 
OP
OP

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Maybe these will help...

Closer Pics of the Rear Cell Group
DSCN6944.jpg

DSCN6945.jpg

DSCN6946.jpg

DSCN6947.jpg

DSCN6949.jpg
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
Your shutter is 1985 - ish. 2nd gen Copal 3 with chrome selector ring. In fact I never saw them call it a 3S until about that time frame. So someone has done a fine job of retro-fitting. 305 Computar f9 in that shutter trumps the he!! out of the ubiquitous Kodak.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom