FWIW, if the KodakAlaris websites resemble the Eastman Kodak websites, the content one sees will or will have varied depending on the geographic market one views it from. So it may have been the case that ColorPlus 200 or Pro Image 100 will have been seen by some, and not by others.
The Kodak...
I believe that tension resulted in better cooperation. The new owners of Alaris, an American firm located in California, no longer have to deal with British retirees from Alaris concerned about their pensions.. They can focus on expanding profits and work directly with Eastman, another...
Color Plus had the biggest backlog because it was one of the most popular films. I think Gold and Color Plus are 1st and 2nd best sellers, I seem to recall reading. I don't think that Alaris would have chosen Color Plus as one to drop, especially if EK were going to distribute a similar or...
Gone?! Were they ever listed? On which page?
I don't remember ColorPlus 200 or Pro Image 100 having a place on KodakAlaris web pages, ever. Do you have a link to such page (on https://web.archive.org)?
See post #66 in this thread, and the internet review linked therein.
The edge printing on the film itself says Kodak - not Kodacolor.
I still would like to know whether it is on acetate or Estar substrate.
The package shown here does not say "Kodak". It might just be possible to sell this film through other channels than Alaris. It is called Kofacolor, and it has the logotype of Eastmn Kodak in it, but not the word "Kodak" anywhere in the film carton shown. Maybe this is a loophole in their...
I don't know about what sort of shotgun marriages you are familiar with, but the fact that the owners of KA paid hundreds of millions of dollars and relieved Eastman Kodak of many, many, many millions of dollars of employee related obligations is the largest dowry I've ever heard of.
No one else...
Next up, Kodak should be able to manufacture white label films for third parties. Out with the old, we're still limiting Kodak based on laws from two generations ago.
It seems Alaris and Eastman made a deal as I alluded to earlier. Exactly what the full scope is unknown at this time. To me, it seems they're attacking the low-cost film market. Running the distribution through Alaris is pushing costs too high. I suspect Alaris gets a royalty from Kodak...
Well spotted. I just looked at KA's site and was going to report the same! Their "everyday films" are now Gold 200 and Ultramax 400. Color Plus and Pro Image are not to be found there or in the "Color Film" page.
That does strongly suggest that Kodacolor 100 is Pro Image, and Kodacolor 200 is...
Yes, and it could still be prohibitively expensive or contractually impossible for Eastman to sell consumer still photography film without Alaris.
Waxing ad nauseam about the opportunities for better prices and no middleman are redundant unless the Eastman/Alaris relationship can be dissolved.
This has been all over YouTube and I imagine other forums for a couple of days as a leak, but today I got an email from freestyle making it official. Kodak has brought the Kodacolor Brand back, and somehow it doesn't seem to be associated with Alaris. The brand is registered by Eastman Kodak...
This is strange. These two "new" films have appeared on the Kodak website. At the same time, they are not listed on the Alaris website, but Color Plus 200 and ProImage 100 are also gone. My theory is that these two films have been rebranded as Kodacolor and will be distributed by Kodak.
The problem is currently, Alaris can mark up the film to whatever they want because Eastman is stuck with them. Of course Eastman is in the same catbird seat as Alaris who is stuck with Eastman's prices. Both of them would try to maximize their profits. This probably accounts for some of the...
A better deal for us would be if Eastman purchased back their distribution rights on all Kodak film from Alaris. That would eliminate higher distribution costs by eliminating Alaris, another company in the middle. That would lower prices for Kodak films across the board.
This also shows that Kingswood Capital Management, the California firm that bought KodakAlaris a couple of years ago, is in it for the long run. This whole thing might have been their idea. That would bode well for Kodak film being around a long time. Companies aren't investing in new...
I think we would be wise not to underestimate KodakAlaris' global distribution capabilities. EK lost all that. It's actually unclear what distribution method(s) they're using for these films.
KodakAlaris may be getting a fee from Eastman for each of these 2 films sold directly by Eastman. It's a way of keeping the price down to about $10 a roll because you're basically eliminating an extra distributor which is just an added, unnecessary cost. It opens the market to just regular...
That Eastman Kodak is 'able' to sell stills film directly without Alaris' input/blessing, it does make one wonder if there's such a bother over photographers getting their hands on rolls of Vision3 anymore?
Either way, I'll reserve my excitement until they start selling Kodacolor in bulk...
Eastman Kodak has a new trademark filed for Kodacolor May 30, 2025. ColorPlus 200 has KodakAlaris on the box. Perhaps others more knowledgeable about recent Kodak events can make something from that.
The big news that is slipping past is Eastman Kodak is selling stills directly to distributors and consumers for the first time in over a decade.
Alaris was sold a little while ago and maybe the new owners don't care much anymore.
A quick search in the same page shows that Ektar, Ultramax, Tri-X, Gold and Ektachrome are trademarks owned also by Eastman Kodak. I didn't find any film trademarks owned by KodakAlaris.
KodakAlaris is the exclusive distributor of some photographic films, they own nothing.
I think they're under contractual obligations not to, so no, I don't think so. Don't ask me about the specific wording and scope of that agreement since it's something between EK and Alaris.
@MattKing is better aware of the stipulations. I don't think EK can sell the exact same product that's...
Kodak owns the trademark but only Alaris can sell, for example Ektar 100 or Portra 400. If Kodak names the emulsion of Portra 400, for example, Professional 400, technically Kodak it self could sell that without Alaris, no?
...page only lists Kodacolor 100 and 200. None of the other Kodak films are listed there. I dunno what conclusion to draw but it's definitely odd
Edit: I checked a box of tri-x in my fridge. It has the URL https://kodakprofessional.com/ listed for development times which is a KodakAlaris website.
EK also owns Ektar trademark. And Tri-X. And T-Max. And Ultramax, Ektachrome...
We all know that KodakAlaris handles all those films, so it would probably be wrong to assume that Kodacolor 100 is now suddenly a still film that EK can market directly.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.