...(this in lieu of f-stop printing, which I think is overly-complicate and fiddly)
Spoon recipes for my most used print developers (D-72 and ID-62)
On the inside of a cabinet door, a printed page with developing times for various film/developer combinations from N-2 through N+2 as well as...
You mean ID-78, which is the Warm=tone version of UD-62. ID-68 is Microphen.
No prints like negatives are never developed to completion. They need to be developed to achieve Dmax, continued development past that just means mid-tones shift darker, and a slight increase in highlights, and any...
...but it has developed some nasty-looking precipitates.
I as actually thinking of making E-72 when I'm done with that bottle. Similar to your ID-62, but without Hydroquinone or Benzotriazole and with Vitamin C instead. --- A "PC" cousin of the "PQ" developer you use.
I'm not sure about doing...
I have the ingredients to make up PQ Unviversal. I am seeing the recipe as ID-62 and there are two versions of this recipe. One regular mix and the other being 2.5 times the strength. Which recipe would be used toward the Ilford black and white reversal process for the first and second...
...30% sulfuric acid, if I can't get the bisulfate. I'll mix it down to 10% when ready to use.
I have noticed two recipes for PQ: One is the ID-62 and the other being the PQ concentrated which is 2.5 times the strength. The instructions for Ilford reversal indicates to use PQ: at 1+5 for the...
...Originally I was going to use D-19 for the developer. Would a longer wash remove most of the thiocyanate before the bleaching step? If not I can go with the ID-62 formula/PQ formula and the Ilford instructions. I have all of the ingredients for that developer except for the benzotriazole.
...there were complaints about colour shifts and increased warmth, as throughput increased and Bromide built up.
They re-formulated ID-20P as ID-62, cutting the Bromide in half and adding Benzotriazole. With the tiny amount of Benzotriazole per litre it wasn't sold as a powder developer, the...
...of Bill Troop’s formulas, it wouldn’t be old enough to pre-date “modern” papers (the past 40+ years). You can use Dektol, Ilford Multigrade, ID-62 or any number of old/new things and get the same results. It’s unclear whether or not any of the usual tweaks really did anything in the old days...
...Fomabrom Variant closer to that of RC Deluxe
I exposed strips of paper, on the baseboard, under a Stouffer step wedge (31x0.1D), developed in ID-62 1+2 for 2 min at 20-22°C. I used an Ilford contrast filter grade 2 in all cases, since Ilford and Foma both indicate a range of 90 for an Ilford...
Either D-72 (MQ) of ID-62 (PQ) stored in a wine pouch keeps 1 year, time enough to use 1 litre or even 2 litrre if reasonably active printing.
Too simple?
...aerial oxidation. The concentrate should last as well (or slightly better) as in factory packaging.
Alternatively, get some raw chemicals and teach your friend to brew up ID-68, ID-62 etc. so he can mix fresh what he needs, when he needs it. The dry components keep indefinitely if stored dry.
Hi,
I’m planning to use it as a film developer to achieve low gamma extremely low contrast for masking purposes. Film in question would be Foma 100, FP4 and Bergger Print Film.
Ian Grant describes Ilford ID-62 as similar to Ilford PQ-U. Full information on his site. That is the paper developer that I use. Good keeping properties, good image quality with Ilford MG and Fomabrom Variant.
http://www.lostlabours.co.uk/photography/formulae/developers/devID62.htm
From what...
...developer reacting with the fixer somehow. I'm not sure of the exact mechanism.
At any rate, I found that other print developers did not have this problem, so just let Liquidol go. It was more trouble than it was worth. I like the results I get with ID-62 better anyway.
Best,
Doremus
...is not very fresh, the carried-over developer discolors.
Use fresh everything or switch to a different developer. I switched to home-mixed ID-62 and D-72 and solved the problem that way.
Despite Liquidol's reputation as long-lasting, I found it less than stellar in that regard as well...
Hi Bernard, thanks for updating. These results are fairly consistent with my tests of PMT (the active ingredient in Finisher Blue) with MQ developers and Ilford papers. Depending on the amount used/required, some speed loss is normal given PMT is a powerful restrainer.
Feedback.
In the meantime, I have received some Moersch Blue Finisher and made tests. Fomabrom variant 111. Stouffer step wedge 0.1D steps. ID-62 1+2 2min @22°C. Amounts 0, 5ml, 10ml per litre of working solution.
Executive summary. It works. Thanks to all those who gave positive input...
First : Do not expand the thumbnails until you have performed the blind test.
Replacing phenidone with metol in ID-62 results in a close approximation of D-72. Except for the restrainer(s), but read on. I've tested both and claim that the tonality is identical. But, (you will say) D-72 has just...
You are correct in that contemporary papers generally have most of their characteristics baked in. Although I’m not sure how effective the usual suggested tweaks ever were in reality with older papers, in my experience those modifications do little (often nothing) to modify the colour of most...
...trying to obtain slightly colder (or less warm) tones from Foma Variant 111, compared to what I'm currently using.
Which is : either D-72 or ID-62. They give identical (to me) results.
Tried a modified ID-62 with no KBr and 2x benzotriazole. Still no difference in a side-by-side comparison...
That's still pretty good, though! I mix the working strength developer stronger, store in fully capped glass bottle in-between sessions and replenish after each session. That way, it keeps going indefinitely!
I will disagree :D But only because the bad thing about ID-62 (or ID-78 the warm tone version) is a Litre on;y lasts 4 printing sessions at 1+3. I typically mix a litre of working strength developer per printing session, topping up if needed.
So instead I mix to commercial strength and use at...
...formula. However the standard developer it is compared to i clearly PQ Universal, and if put in a spreadsheet you can see it's concentrated ID-62 with the Sodium Carbonate substituted wit Potassium Carbonate and Hydroxide.
Bromophen is almost certainly ID-20 PQ which Ilford sold in powder...
I am confused here Your recipe makes 3 litres which I presume is not diluted but ready to use.Then you say double the amounts in the formula if you want a stock solution that you can dilute 1+3
The formula seems to make 3 litres but is ready for use as 3 litres but if you double the ingredient...
...12 gm.
Sodium carbonate, mono-. 80 gm.
Potassium bromide, anhyd. - 2 gm.
Cold water to make ---------1 liter
Dilute 1+2 for use
Ilford ID-62 is very close to Bromophen.
Water (at 125°F) ------------ 750ml
Sodium Sulfite--------------- 50 grams
Hydroquinone --------------- 12 grams...
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.