...reason, and notes to financial statements are unlikely to be very specific about film sales - with the possible exception of Instax.
KodakAlaris' financial statements might be interesting in future years, but as the 2020 statements are likely to reflect mostly the divestment to Sino Promise...
...have a lot to do with supplying and servicing processing labs. Which includes dealing with the technical requirements of scanners.
And KodakAlaris' marketing efforts are also highly connected with the needs of labs.
I guarantee that the criteria for effective scanning played a large role in...
As someone who provided requirements to suppliers that they then satisfied by designing and manufacturing things, I too participated in design reviews and production readiness reviews. I'd never claim to have designed or manufactured those things. :smile:
KodakAlaris people were in the design rooms and on the production design floor.
The marketing departments of the various Kodaks were full of engineers, as well as people trained mainly in marketing.
It was a very close, symbiotic relationship, and that continued after KodakAlaris came into being.
Those are requirements. They're characteristics KodakAlaris desired. Eastman Kodak satisfied Alaris' requirements through its internal process of design and manufacture, carried out by engineers, scientists and production personnel.
Not entirely correct.
Many/most of the staff at KodakAlaris used to be employees of Eastman Kodak or one of its international subsidiaries. They were the employees in the marketing and distribution parts of the business. And just as in most businesses that both manufacture and market their...
Yes, it is. Both are correct statements. However, Apple designs its crapple, then contracts manufacture to Foxcon. Marketing entity KodakAlaris relies entirely on Eastman Kodak for Ektachrome 100 design and manufacture.
As I understand it, the solution involved all parties - Eastman Kodak, KodakAlaris and the backing paper supplier/printer. And it was very challenging. And the knowledge of how it was done is considered an important trade secret.
you might consider making contact sheets of whichever results you want to inspect/compare. unless the negative is your final product it really has little to do with your results. your "cooked" film might look good as a print or inverted scan or however you like to present the images, I...
So, I cooked the Tri-X too long (about 2x!) due to using old data. I pulled the Tri-X sheet from KodakAlaris and proper time would have been something like 2 minutes at that temperature...clearly not recommended. Plus, the data sheet only provides times for dilution A and B, so I would have to...
...scenario that would result in any return on investment in any reasonable period of time.
As best as I can tell, it is the minimum order quantity for the leaders and trailers that precludes KodakAlaris and Eastman Kodak from doing it as well. Their 220 equipment may also have been...
Misfire. That's good information. I've been shooting Kodak film all along never had a problem. I too shoot more medium format, so 120 is what I use most. I did see where KodakAlaris posted something about a temporary change in the 135 magazine end caps.
Best Mike
That is actually on the KodakAlaris site. It is the graphic they use when someone tries to link to an expired former link on their site - in that case the page where one used to find information about Kodak chemicals (which is no longer part of the KodakAlaris business).
The new owners of...
...the website address right underneath is www.kodakalaris.com/go/professional, which of course gets you to a page not found memo on KodakAlaris' site.
For Andrew: do the larger white bags contain two smaller bags that seem similar to the smaller bags?
I also received a requested replacement of...
In the UK , I received my bottle of 501 05141, 2016 msds today.
It is marked "Made in Germany for KodakAlaris" "Expiry 2023"
This link from 2019 notes that "Today Kodak's cash cow developers Xtol and HC-110 [were] produced by Tetenal"...
My researches indicate that the exclusive distributor in Europe for KodakAlaris chemicals was - wait for it - Tetenal.
And the retailers there are still looking to get their Kodak branded chemicals from Tetenal.
And don't know what is going to happen with KodakAlaris out of the picture.
...in June 2020, with an expiry date in early 2022. It's from the batch that suffers from precipitation of some salt, after prodding KodakAlaris they said it was a problem related to low temperatures... no replacement offer or other explanation. I digress! Despite lots of crystals and being...
One complicating factor about all this is that KodakAlaris never sold directly to retailers - only distributors.
So the possibility exists that any retailer who still shows a picture of the old type on their website, may be buying from a distributor who, contrary to most current practices...
Hopefully whoever is putting this stuff together can get it right. The brown Dektol is disturbing. Helluva thing to pick up a Kodak product and have doubt.
Not like the old days
Same for KodakAlaris and Eastman Kodak before them (for several years). Manufacturing had been contracted out for many years.
The recent quality problems coincided with US based KodakAlaris (in most marketing capacities) attempting to bring manufacturing back to the USA, after Tetenal went...
As near as I can research, KodakAlaris film revenue went up from $54 million to $71 million Mar 2019 to Mar 2020 with a gross profit of $19 million. What happened during the last twelve months, I don;t know.
application-pdf
...dial itself. The development numbers are easily determined by just reverse engineering one data point from the data sheets from KodakAlaris/now Sino Promise for the developer.
The chart I posted was from the 2018 version of the X-Tol data sheet.
Here is the current link on the Sino Promise...
Ilford's times do not produce the same contrast between the two emulsions. I've not looked specifically at ID-11 and these two emulsions, however, my experience with other Ilford developers have shown that the times listed between Ilford and Kodak films does not produce the same contrast when...
Would the above then lead to HP5+ and Tri-X in the same developer, ID11, at the box speed and for the Ilford times for both films result in this let's say, apparent difference in shadow detail and box speed. I mention ID11 as Ilford gives times for both films at 400 so presumably ( but this...
Actually, Cinestill is buying enough Kodak cine emulsion stock at one time to have Kodak (whichever entity actually produces the Visions3 film stocks) produce it without the remjet, as well as have it cut in non-cine format. There is no method of removing the remjet, once applied, without...
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.