...Kodak black and white film stocks.
Eastman Kodak makes, markets, distributes and sells motion picture films.
Eastman Kodak makes the still films, and sells all of its production to KodakAlaris, who shoulder all the costs and responsibilities to market and distribute those to local...
Yes, I have spoken to official Kodak distributors - they say direct orders and that's it.
I've been meaning to make an inquiry directly to ei-order@kodak.com for quite some time - today I did. I ordered 5294 and 7294 (16mm 1R) - quick response from Kodak. It was not clear where they would be...
Problem in Europe is usually that the official dealers of movie film refuse to sell you Ekrachrome, except if it is for a production you can name. "Please ask for prices. Delivery directly to production only". Alaris seems to want to prevent anybody from rolling bulk Ektachrome. It is a pity...
...Aerocolor IV which again is repackaged to buggery. Neither of these are generally available to the public, so the repackaging is legit.
KodakAlaris (separate from Eastman) market the rest of the Kodak line of films: Gold, Ultramax, Portra, Ektar and Ektachrome, Tri-X, and T-Max.
Fujifilm...
Anybody using Ilford HC or other HC-110 equivalents? I’ve used HC-110 since forever and given the chaos that is Kodak/Alaris/Sino Promise/etc. it seems prudent to start looking for alternatives. Roughly I want one-shot chemistry concentrate that has a reasonably long shelf life; ability to do...
Actually, that horse is quite alive and eager to be ridden.
When Eastman Kodak and KodakAlaris were working together to bring back Ektachrome, one of the design goals was to incorporate changes that improved the ability of the film to withstand the new realities of the distribution system -...
I recently bought a bottle of the 'new' HC-110 from Glass Key in San Francisco. The bottle only mentions 'Kodak Alaris', no mention of Sino Promise. The expiry date is 2023/12 and I *think* the manufacturing date is some time in 2021, although the ink is a bit smudged on the bottle and hard to...
...and some of it is getting out there.
All the Sino Promise in Rochester badging most likely reflects Sino Promise's take over of parts of KodakAlaris' infrastructure - although technically a UK company, their Kodak branded business (KodakAlaris') was and is headquartered in the USA -...
...it.
Sino-Promise is a HK based company, so they may very well use a HK address for the Asia -Pacific region.
I wonder of Eastman Kodak or KodakALaris have something in their contracts which require the return of the trademark license if the products are not being distributed to Kodak's...
...probably plays a part. The price difference between Kodak and Ilford may be less in some parts of the world. I live pretty close to KodakAlaris Hemel Hempstead HQ but I don't suppose that makes Kodak any cheaper than if I lived in Scotland. It's not like I'm hundreds of miles from Mobberly...
Interesting. All I know is a bunch of their stuff effectively disappeared for over a month with "unofficial word" that they'd ceased operations, and now it looks like it's largely back, at least for the BW chemistry. So, I don't know. If I can order it and get it in, I will, as it sells quite...
To the best of my knowledge, neither Eastman Kodak nor KodakAlaris can use the Kodak brand on any of the still photography chemistry - that right is still in Sino Promise's hands - unless (aand I have no knowledge of the exact situation) it is in the hands of whatever fills the role of a...
Yeah, I realize that. But dispite what folks told me, it has been working out. Even if it’s only viable on a small scale.
I get them by the handful from my lab for free, and I think most labs are happy to give them to you if you ask.
I have 10 old Ilford cassettes that I use for personal...
I applaud your efforts.
I'm assuming though that you can appreciate that you and your customers are unusual, and sufficiently "rare" that neither Eastman Kodak nor KodakAlaris would be likely to be able to base their business plans on your examples.
If there was a market with decent volumes and associated cameras that used 1000 foot loads of T-Max and Tri-X still film, you would see it marketed that way.
It would be through the KodakAlaris distribution network though - not directly from Eastman Kodak.
...well pay you to do so.
But those two "ifs" are big ones. The vast majority of users - the ones that Eastman Kodak (for cine film) and KodakAlaris/distributors/retailers sell almost all film to, aren't willing to accept those risks.
Comparing the cost of 1000 foot loads of cine film to...
Kodak makes printers and supplies for the print industry.
KodakAlaris is a "data capture" company, selling scanners and entire "data acquisition solutions" to industry.
Film is not something they really need to make or sell, anymore. It won't bankrupt them if they stop.
...you will need to approach your local retailer and ask them to approach a local distributor. That distributor will then need to convince KodakAlaris that there is sufficient volume to add that as a SKU to their product catalogue - KodakAlaris has the worldwide marketing and distribution...
...is a diverse company and if you looks a bit closer at the annual report they are actually losing money on their ongoing operations.
KodakAlaris, which is the division responsible for film, represents about 6% of their business by revenue. That is part of the Advanced Materials and Chmicals...
Well, if the instructions on the packages are understood to be referring to older versions of the same product, with their inane rearranged names and so on, there are not any discrepancies on any of the things we've looked at except between what's listed on the current D76 data sheet and what...
...experience and recognized counselling credentials)
As far as I can tell, some of the discrepancies extend back into the times before KodakAlaris existed - they originated with Eastman Kodak.
And as for Sino Promise, they got (and paid for) the business at just about exactly the same time...
Thanks, Don, for clearing that up. To be fair I think I can recall Ilford having a couple of anomalies in its sheets but finding the info from Ilford seems much easier. Unfortunately Kodak's situation in relation to those chemicals still labelled Kodak is that to most consumers wishing to check...
They still host it
https://imaging.kodakalaris.com/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pro/chemistry/j78.pdf
So the moral is they've always been a bunch of morons?
And that datasheet is unchanged from before 2020, when KodakAlaris hosted it, and was responsible for the distribution and marketing for D-76 and the other Kodak chemicals.
That current datasheet is also the same - with respect to many of the films listed - as the 2002 datasheet that was...
The current D76 sheet hosted by KodakAlaris is provided by Sino and it has the wrong times for Tri-x, Tmax 100, and Tmax 400.
The correct times are on the individual sheets for the films. In the case of Tri-X, it would be 6 mins, 45 secs.
I contacted KodakAlaris.
I'm not sure about the "maintaining" part. The only changes effected by KodakAlaris to the pre-2012 datasheets are the addition of KodakAlaris' name, and the deletion of most references to no longer available Kodak branded products.
...a Imacon PIII.
This may be a possible reason for the inconsistencies and lack of coordinated updates between the two data sheets.
But KodakAlaris is hosting both data sheets on their web site (imaging.kodakalaris.com) and is the owner (if thats the right description) of both PDF documents...
...no value. They don't address the concerns I brought up. If "error" is a reason for discrepancies among data sheets that are located on KodakAlaris' website, that is a problem - one you seem to think is insignificant.
Kodak is not infallible, no mater how much you want them to be.
Kodak...
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.