• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Fungus or Coating or Delaminating?

Bacon Fest 2013

A
Bacon Fest 2013

  • 0
  • 3
  • 60
Other side

H
Other side

  • 0
  • 0
  • 49

Forum statistics

Threads
203,426
Messages
2,854,421
Members
101,830
Latest member
gussie54
Recent bookmarks
0

Ozark Wolverine

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 17, 2022
Messages
96
Location
Mountain Grove, MO
Format
Medium Format
Hello everyone. I came across a Computar dL 3.5/65 enlarging lens in a box of other Analog accessories at a Camera store in Syracuse, NY for cheap about 7 or 8 years ago . . . The lens was in it's original consumer packaging and appears to never have been sold or used.

On the inside of the rear element something is funky . . . Image 1 and 2 are backlit with an LED flashlight, image 3 is the reflection of the sky, no backlighting.


20260311_095237.jpg
20260311_095254.jpg
20260311_095109.jpg
 
I like the Computars but they all did this. I think every one that I have owned had to be re-cemented. It is cement failure.

Don't throw out the lens. The cement they used dissolves in Acetone so they come apart fairly easily. The cement is a part of the optical calculations so just removing it won't make the lens work properly. It really needs to be re-cemented with an appropriate cement.

The 65 that I have is one of the best lenses I've ever used. Almost keeps up with my Zeiss.
 
I like the Computars but they all did this. I think every one that I have owned had to be re-cemented. It is cement failure.

Don't throw out the lens. The cement they used dissolves in Acetone so they come apart fairly easily. The cement is a part of the optical calculations so just removing it won't make the lens work properly. It really needs to be re-cemented with an appropriate cement.

The 65 that I have is one of the best lenses I've ever used. Almost keeps up with my Zeiss.

Patrick, you have convinced me to try to save it. Where does one send this lens to have it recemented? I do 35mm and 120 so this lens will work with both.
 
I'd still give it a shot. If it so happens we're both wrong and you can clean it up, you've got a usable lens.

Thanks koraks, I will disassemble it and see what we've got. I have read very good things about this lens so unless it is prohibitively expensive I am going to try to save it. I am currently using a Nikon 5.6/80 and a Nikon 2.8/50 for printing. I have been happy with them for three or four years of printing. But I am just a hobbyist I know just enough to be cringe worthy . . . LOL 🙃
 
The cement is a part of the optical calculations so just removing it won't make the lens work properly. It really needs to be re-cemented with an appropriate cement.
Does it then also matter what kind of cement is used, or is it's primary importance that the group behaves as a single lens?
 
I'm sure it matters what kind of cement is used. I ended up using Canada Balsam because I had it and it worked fine on all the ones I re-cemented. Modern UV cements are probably better to use but I don't know what kind to use. I forget what the measurement is called that you need to pay attention to- something diffraction. I guess different cements bend the light differently.
 
Norland 60 or 61 I think is the one to get, expensive (£33 / $42 / oz). Also some UV source to set.
It has a relatively short shelf life (keep in dark fridge). Where I worked we used it way beyond the date indicated with no problems. Don't shake before use or you'll be popping bubbles with a pin for ever!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom