Looks very good. I might just have made a lucky guess but something about the thumbnail said "HP5+ " to me. There does seem to be a kind of a "signature" with HP5+.
@pentaxuser I think it has to do with shadow details. At some point I made a comparison between tri-x and HP5+ and it's really the level of details in the shadow that changes. Makes for more even tonality, which I like in 120.
Thanks for the reply and you make an interesting point about HP5+ v Tri-X. I haven't used Tri-X but In just about every comparison test I have seen, HP5+ seems to have the more open shadows but a number of Photrio members say this is largely accounted for by different contrast indices aimed for in the development times by the two film makers with the same developer