Untitled

• JHannon

• Apr 27, 2005

Hi Ed! It has a nice "dreamy" look.. I just bought some Agfa APX 100 in 120. I am hoping it is as good as the 4X5 APX (can't get it any more). Good to see your work.

 

• 

  Ed Sukach

• Apr 27, 2005

We see as through a glass, darkly. This is an illustration of the superiority of "wet" prints over the digital file - as shown here. There is a "notchiness" in the scan that is not present in the original -- i.e., the line formed by the top of her hand in the original is a straight, smooth line; the right side of her cheek is smooth;there is a definte separation of her hair from the darker background; tonality and smoothness is simply better in the original.
I *LOVE* Analog.

 

• 

  Charles Webb

• Apr 27, 2005

Ed, this is a neat image, poor scan or not, I like it! Thanks for posting it.

 

• 

  gma

• Apr 28, 2005

I think this is a good scan considering our limitations on file size.

I wonder if anyone could tell the difference between an enlargement from a mini negative and a contact print from 8x10.

 

• 

  smudge

• Apr 30, 2005

why is it the photographs of naked women seem to get 2 to 3 times more views than others, funny that.

 

• 

  gma

• Apr 30, 2005

I refer to these as nude figure studies. It sounds better than pictures of naked women.

 

• 

  JohnArs

• Apr 30, 2005

Hi smudge

why is it the photographs of naked women seem to get 2 to 3 times more views than others, funny that.
Because a beautyfull nude woman is itself art, actually the most perfect artwork!
Just my personal view!

 

• AeisLugh

• Mar 15, 2006

The word 'naked' sounds so vulgar, inspiring thoughts of pornography. the term "nude" inspires more of an artistic flavor, which definitely fits this shot.

I love it, as someone else said, a very dreamlike quality.