Tubes And Legs

• Vahid Naziri

• Nov 18, 2005

As a photograph, it looks great also.

 

• 

  bill schwab

• Nov 18, 2005

Very interesting and quite a departure from your other work. I like it.

 

• 

  BradS

• Nov 18, 2005

Thomas, this is not one of your better poses in my opinion. The whole scene just lacks the creativity that I see in much of the rest of your work. Usually, when I look at one of your photos of this genere, I get the feeling that the photo is simply the culmination of much creative planning, elaborate set design and careful lighting. This one comes up short for me.

 

• pentaxuser

• Nov 18, 2005

Can't speak about its artistic merits. Such things are very subjective anyway. It's amusingly quirky. I especially like the contrast between the two legs which separates both from the grey background.

 

• Jorge

• Nov 18, 2005

LOL....you are going to hate me for this, since I seem to be 2 for 2, but there is something wrong with the hands. One seems to be a male hand and the other a female hand. The male hand looks out of place and way too big in relation to the rest of the body parts.

I see your intention with the legs, but IMO a simple shot with the legs straight up and just one hand covering the genitalia would have been better......

Oh...oops...not the critique forum.....well....bite me!

 

• Thomassauerwein

• Nov 18, 2005

Well Jorge that is 2 Chritmas card years your deleted from "Oh" and another thing only if your a big juicey steak!
Brad, I kind of agree. But the humor for me is still there. If the componeants where moved a bit the relationships may make more sense.
Thanks for all the comments!!!

 

• 

  wfe

• Nov 18, 2005

I have to agree with Brad but I do think the concept of the legs and tubes is a good one and could work well with a better pose.

 

• 

  rfshootist

• Nov 19, 2005

For me it does not come short at all. I find it to be a well thought and perfectly executed
work. For the hands tho I'd try to find another solution, one that that covers less intentively , more coincidentally ?.

 

• 

  jd callow

• Nov 19, 2005

 

• 

  RalphLambrecht

• Feb 23, 2007

Simply fantastic. I'm very impressed.