Titmouse II
Acere

Titmouse II

This was one processed with Topaz AI for grain removal. Which do you prefer?
Location
Backyard apple tree
Equipment Used
F6 200-500mm
Exposure
1/250 sec. f/6.3 SB800 at -0.7
Film & Developer
Ilford XP2 Super 400 C41
Digital Post Processing Details
Topaz de-noise, crop, reduce size, 16x9 format
I grant PHOTRIO permission to share this gallery image and previous images on their social media pages.
  1. Yes
(optional) Preferred name for image credit on social media.
Rolando Chavez
I prefer the grainy one. This one looks off and...artificial to me 🤪 I like the sharpness of the bird, but I think there's something about the depth of field that doesn't look right. Also, the lack of grain makes it look plasticky to me, but I don't know if I'd feel the same way if I wasn't looking at them side by side.
 
I don't think Topaz is doing you any favors here. I use Topaz to denoise and oversharpen images that I print as digital negatives for making kallitypes. But for a final image on a computer screen, it is easy to go overboard. One of the issues with this image is how the sharpening overemphasizes the lines in focus -- the back of the bird, the foreground branch at lower right. There is also a texture issue, though I hesitate to say much more without seeing the original. XP2 is a chromogenic film, without a lot of grain to begin with. If you're looking to remove all hint of grain, then why bother shooting film at all?
 
I don't think Topaz is doing you any favors here. I use Topaz to denoise and oversharpen images that I print as digital negatives for making kallitypes. But for a final image on a computer screen, it is easy to go overboard. One of the issues with this image is how the sharpening overemphasizes the lines in focus -- the back of the bird, the foreground branch at lower right. There is also a texture issue, though I hesitate to say much more without seeing the original. XP2 is a chromogenic film, without a lot of grain to begin with. If you're looking to remove all hint of grain, then why bother shooting film at all?
Hi Sanders and thanks for your input. I understand and agree with your point but only a slight amount of noise reduction was applied and barely any detail enhancement. I too don't like overprocessed images either. I don't mind grain but its not the reason I shoot film nor do I like it in certain types of photographs. It invokes a look and feeling that's appropriate for many types of images but unwelcomed in others. We all have our preferences but I personally dislike grain in portraits, nature, wildlife or scenic shots.

Rolando
 
I prefer the grainy one. This one looks off and...artificial to me 🤪 I like the sharpness of the bird, but I think there's something about the depth of field that doesn't look right. Also, the lack of grain makes it look plasticky to me, but I don't know if I'd feel the same way if I wasn't looking at them side by side.
Hi Daniela thanks for your input as well. 👍
 

Media information

Category
Standard Gallery
Added by
Acere
Date added
View count
516
Comment count
5
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
F6-823689005039-R1-E036 (36)-2-55%.jpg
File size
132.3 KB
Date taken
Tue, 12 March 2024 6:10 PM
Dimensions
1419px x 798px

Share this media

Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom