Either the negative was underexposed or the print has been overexposed but somewhere along the line you ended up with a print that IMHO is too dark, with contrast and and texture lost in both the foliage and the wood supporting the tap. There appears to be such a large range between the sky and everything else that I'd guess you based the exposure on the wood/foliage, which overexposed the sky, and then to get any sky information in the print you had to overexpose the print. Exposing for the foliage/tap and then using minus 1 or 2 development might have helped if that is in fact what occurred. But without seeing the negative it's hard to know exactly what happened.
I'm not totally happy with this myself as I don't think there is enough contrast between the post/pipe and the foliage behind. Also the sky was very bland that day.
I don't think the scan does it any favours either. The exposure f11 1/125 is the same as my previous gate image f16 1/60 and these two were taken within minutes of each other in the same light so I don't think the exposure or processing of the film is very far out.