softbeach

I like the multiple exposures with the water,it adds drama and compliments the cloudy,possibly storm approaching sky.

Yes - I like it too. The multiple exposures create quite a different affect. Would love to see more. regards John.

Nice work. This technique really intrigues me. I can only imagine what the actual print looks like. Keep showing us more.
gene

Beauty - eh.

A lovely shot...how did you happen to choose 20 exposures?

Really interesting. I had thought of trying a multiple exposure but hadn't ever seen an example t prove it worked. Now I have and I will try it.

A very interesting alternative to a long exposure water shot. Were they taken in quick succession or over a period?

Yes - they were taken at carefully chosen moments over a period of several minutes to capture the water at all possible levels. The real expusure was determined to be 16 but at 500th and TRI X I figured there would be a little recipricocity failure so I could afford some more without an overexposure. The technique is pretty straightforward. With sunny 16 - f16 at 125th or 2 exposures at 250 or 4 exposures at 500 - with f22 I get 8 and f32 I get 16. The light was f11 at 125 for ASA 200 (Where I rate TRI-X) I kept all the detail in the rocks and the neg scan doesn't get all the sky detail which will come out in the print. - Frank

Les posted a similar photo last week with 200 exposures. It should still be in a gallery.

frank, you sound like a genious from the comment. I sat here reading it all trying to make sense of it, but all of the logic kind of got blurred together. I'll stick to one or two exposures per frame for the sake of teh photographic community, until i can compute all that stuff in my head.